Ivo De Decker writes (Re: Bug#682100: gscan2pdf Recommends cuneiform which is
in non-free):
Gscan2pdf is used to scan documents and make pdf's from them. If you
just want to have a scan of the image, it works perfectly without
ocr. I often use it that way. I hadn't even noticed that ocr
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:42:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ivo De Decker writes (Re: Bug#682100: gscan2pdf Recommends cuneiform which
is in non-free):
Gscan2pdf is used to scan documents and make pdf's from them. If you
just want to have a scan of the image, it works perfectly without
Evgeni Golov writes (Re: Bug#682100: gscan2pdf Recommends cuneiform which is
in non-free):
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:42:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
In that case, the dependency relationship should be Suggests, not
Recommends. In the words of the manual, Recommends is to be used when
Package: gscan2pdf
Version: 1.0.4-3
Severity: serious
I see here:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/gscan2pdf
this
rec: cuneiform
multi-language OCR system
but
http://packages.debian.org/sid/cuneiform
says
Package: cuneiform (1.1.0+dfsg-4 and others) [non-free]
I think this is an RC
Hi,
if one should trust the package description
OCR can be used to recognise text in the scans, and the output
embedded in the PDF or DjVu.
the OCR feature is purely optional and thus gscan2pdf should work fine
w/o any ocr backend.
Also, gscan2pdf Rcommends gocr, tesseract-ocr, cuneiform,
Evgeni Golov writes (Bug#682100: gscan2pdf Recommends cuneiform which is in
non-free):
the OCR feature is purely optional and thus gscan2pdf should work fine
w/o any ocr backend.
Thanks for responding.
Also, gscan2pdf Rcommends gocr, tesseract-ocr, cuneiform, which all
are OCR tools
Ian,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:39:18PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
How well does gscan2pdf work without ocr software ? Would you say it
should be used with ocr software in all but unusual situations ?
Gscan2pdf is used to scan documents and make pdf's from them. If you just want
to have a scan
On 19 July 2012 17:53, Evgeni Golov evg...@golov.de wrote:
From this I think cuneiform can be perfectly moved to Suggests.
I hadn't realised that cuneiform was non-free.
I don't understand why
Recommends: gocr, tesseract-ocr, cuneiform
is not ok. but
Recommends: gocr | tesseract-ocr |
Jeffrey Ratcliffe writes (Bug#682100: gscan2pdf Recommends cuneiform which is
in non-free):
On 19 July 2012 17:53, Evgeni Golov evg...@golov.de wrote:
From this I think cuneiform can be perfectly moved to Suggests.
I hadn't realised that cuneiform was non-free.
I don't understand why
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:19 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
I hadn't realised that cuneiform was non-free.
I don't understand why
Recommends: gocr, tesseract-ocr, cuneiform
This says all three packages are recommended, so with installation of
recommends turned on package managers will
10 matches
Mail list logo
