Bug#695268: liblockfile1: harmful remove action in M-A:same package

2012-12-11 Thread AnĂ­bal Monsalve Salazar
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 05:55:20PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote: >I suspect this may be a reasonable fix: Thank you. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/695655 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de

Bug#695268: liblockfile1: harmful remove action in M-A:same package

2012-12-09 Thread Rob Browning
I suspect this may be a reasonable fix: diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 0b3a119..d000449 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +liblockfile (1.09-4.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Don't remove /usr/share/doc/liblockfile1 from the postrm anymo

Bug#695268: liblockfile1: harmful remove action in M-A:same package

2012-12-07 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I looked at the package and am baffled by the postinst and postrm scripts. They are (should be?) entirely useless (manually calling ldconfig ??). I then brought up debian/rules and immediately saw what the reason for that method is: Complete

Bug#695268: liblockfile1: harmful remove action in M-A:same package

2012-12-06 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: liblockfile1 Version: 1.09-4 Severity: serious Steps taken: Install liblockfile1:amd64. Observe that it ships /usr/share/doc/liblockfile1. Install liblockfile1:i386. Observe that /usr/share/doc/liblockfile1 is still correctly there. Remove liblockfile1:i386, but not liblockfile1:amd64. N