On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:17:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 10:24 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:31:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Cool; thanks. Did you have chance to look at whether fixing the testing
package just requires the source file
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 20:21 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:17:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 10:24 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
The package I prepared and built for testing also required 2 other
patches, to fix
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 10:24 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:31:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Cool; thanks. Did you have chance to look at whether fixing the testing
package just requires the source file split or if there were any other
issues?
The package I prepared
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:31:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 21:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:21:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 21:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:21:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, as we need
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, as we need the issues
fixing there in any case, however we proceed; thanks.
Done, 3.1.0~rc2-2 just uploaded to sid.
That was a
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:21:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, as we need the issues
fixing there in any case, however we proceed;
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 19:45 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
It seems like I could come up with a patch. A whole day's worth work :)
Thanks!
I made a patch both for the version in sid, and the one in testing.
I'd really prefer to upload it to sid, and then let it flow to testing, but
the
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 19:45 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
[..]
I made a patch both for the version in sid, and the one in testing.
I'd really prefer to upload it to sid, and then let it flow to testing, but
the current upstream
retitle 698341 pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1
user 698341 release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 698341 = pu
thanks
Hello RT,
let's try to fix this instead of going for removal.
I've applied the debdiff prepared by Felix Geyer in #683075 [0], and checked
that it
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 09:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
retitle 698341 pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1
user 698341 release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 698341 = pu
Nope. pu is for stable; fixed up.
I've applied the debdiff prepared by Felix Geyer in #683075 [0],
11 matches
Mail list logo
