Bug#701178: preapproval unblock: dspam/dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-9

2013-03-01 Thread Julien Cristau
Actually... On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 22:49:21 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/patches/009_fix_recipient_corruption_when_releasing_message_from_quarantine.diff

Bug#701178: preapproval unblock: dspam/dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-9

2013-03-01 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le vendredi 1 mars 2013 14:00:07, Julien Cristau a écrit : Actually... Seems like ATX-recipient now points somewhere on the stack, and thus in la-la-land at the end of the loop in process_users. Is there any guarantee it's not reused after that? The scoping is kind of non-obvious...

Bug#701178: preapproval unblock: dspam/dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-9

2013-02-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 14:01:45 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dspam [Sorry Jonathan for the duplicate] Current dspam is affected by a corruption of

Bug#701178: preapproval unblock: dspam/dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-9

2013-02-28 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 22:49:21 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Le jeudi 28 février 2013 20:56:54, Julien Cristau a écrit : That debdiff is for 3.10.2 in sid. Do you have one for 3.10.1? Sure, sorry. Here you are. Thanks. Go ahead. Cheers, Julien

Bug#701178: preapproval unblock: dspam/dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-9

2013-02-28 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Le jeudi 28 février 2013 20:56:54, Julien Cristau a écrit : That debdiff is for 3.10.2 in sid. Do you have one for 3.10.1? Sure, sorry. Here you are. Pretty much the same except for the offsets. :) Thanks, Julien Best regards, Thomas diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog

Bug#701178: preapproval unblock: dspam/dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-9

2013-02-22 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dspam [Sorry Jonathan for the duplicate] Current dspam is affected by a corruption of message headers when releasing from quarantine. This has for effect that mails