Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-25 Thread Georg Sassen
Hi, On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:39:27 + Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: With the 3.8 kernel it works fine, the gma500_gfx module ist loaded and the native resolution of the display shown. Debian package or custom kernel? The one I tried was ii linux-image-3.8-trunk-686-pae

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 14:33 +0100, Georg Sassen wrote: Hi Jonathan, Thanks for reporting. Can you reproduce this using xserver-xorg-video-modesetting and the 3.8.y kernel from experimental as well? With the 3.8 kernel it works fine, the gma500_gfx module ist

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-22 Thread Georg Sassen
Quoting myself: Georg Sassen debianb...@georgsassen.de wrote: It seems CONFIG_DRM_GMA500 (and maybe CONFIG_STUB_POULSBO) is not set in the kernel config, so the gma500_gfx is not built at all, maybe because of the name change from psb_gfx which was loaded with the 3.2.35 kernel. I enabled

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi again, I left out the URL for Intel's bug reporting guidelines: Jonathan Nieder wrote: Georg Sassen wrote: While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution in X11 and the initial framebuffer now on my

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Georg Sassen
Hi Jonathan, Thanks for reporting. Can you reproduce this using xserver-xorg-video-modesetting and the 3.8.y kernel from experimental as well? With the 3.8 kernel it works fine, the gma500_gfx module ist loaded and the native resolution of the display shown. I don't see your GPU driver

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 22:58:41 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi again, I left out the URL for Intel's bug reporting guidelines: Jonathan Nieder wrote: Georg Sassen wrote: While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 22:58:41 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Jonathan Nieder wrote: Georg Sassen wrote: While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution in X11 and the initial

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:03:56 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I know Alan takes reports through bugzilla.kernel.org Still? I thought that would have kinda stopped after https://plus.google.com/04121194250082892/posts/KW3TdRYwjr9 Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:03:56 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I know Alan takes reports through bugzilla.kernel.org Still? I thought that would have kinda stopped after https://plus.google.com/04121194250082892/posts/KW3TdRYwjr9 You're right. I'm out of date.

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-20 Thread Georg Sassen
Package: src:linux Version: 3.2.39-2 Severity: important While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution in X11 and the initial framebuffer now on my Nokia Booklet 3G since the update. -- Package-specific

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Georg, Georg Sassen wrote: While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution in X11 and the initial framebuffer now on my Nokia Booklet 3G since the update. Thanks for reporting. Can you reproduce this