Hi,
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:39:27 +
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
With the 3.8 kernel it works fine, the gma500_gfx module ist loaded
and the native resolution of the display shown.
Debian package or custom kernel?
The one I tried was
ii linux-image-3.8-trunk-686-pae
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 14:33 +0100, Georg Sassen wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for reporting. Can you reproduce this using
xserver-xorg-video-modesetting and the 3.8.y kernel from experimental
as well?
With the 3.8 kernel it works fine, the gma500_gfx module ist
Quoting myself:
Georg Sassen debianb...@georgsassen.de wrote:
It seems CONFIG_DRM_GMA500 (and maybe CONFIG_STUB_POULSBO) is not set
in the kernel config, so the gma500_gfx is not built at all, maybe
because of the name change from psb_gfx which was loaded with the
3.2.35 kernel.
I enabled
Hi again,
I left out the URL for Intel's bug reporting guidelines:
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Georg Sassen wrote:
While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel
version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution
in X11 and the initial framebuffer now on my
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for reporting. Can you reproduce this using
xserver-xorg-video-modesetting and the 3.8.y kernel from experimental
as well?
With the 3.8 kernel it works fine, the gma500_gfx module ist loaded
and the native resolution of the display shown.
I don't see your GPU driver
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 22:58:41 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi again,
I left out the URL for Intel's bug reporting guidelines:
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Georg Sassen wrote:
While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel
version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 22:58:41 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Georg Sassen wrote:
While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel
version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution
in X11 and the initial
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:03:56 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I know Alan takes reports through bugzilla.kernel.org
Still? I thought that would have kinda stopped after
https://plus.google.com/04121194250082892/posts/KW3TdRYwjr9
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:03:56 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I know Alan takes reports through bugzilla.kernel.org
Still? I thought that would have kinda stopped after
https://plus.google.com/04121194250082892/posts/KW3TdRYwjr9
You're right. I'm out of date.
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.39-2
Severity: important
While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel version
3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution in X11 and the
initial framebuffer now on my Nokia Booklet 3G since the update.
-- Package-specific
Hi Georg,
Georg Sassen wrote:
While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel
version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution
in X11 and the initial framebuffer now on my Nokia Booklet 3G since
the update.
Thanks for reporting. Can you reproduce this
11 matches
Mail list logo