Am Dienstag, den 26.03.2013, 00:10 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
On 03/25/2013 07:59 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 13:13 +0100 schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
Could you instead package jdownloader itself?
On 03/29/2013 12:25 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
JDownloader comes with an updater that will update itself.
Gosh! One more reason why not to package it then. You would otherwise
provide a backdoor to a 3rd party in any Debian system that has this
installed.
In Debian, we have a unified tool called
Benjamin Drung:
Am Dienstag, den 26.03.2013, 00:10 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
On 03/25/2013 07:59 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 13:13 +0100 schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
Could you instead package
Hi,
On Samstag, 23. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote:
* Package name: jdownloader
* License : GPL-3
Section : contrib/web
Description : download manager for one-click hosting sites
JDownloader is open source, platform independent and written completely in
Am Sonntag, den 24.03.2013, 11:28 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen:
Hi,
On Samstag, 23. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote:
* Package name: jdownloader
* License : GPL-3
Section : contrib/web
Description : download manager for one-click hosting sites
Hi Benjamin,
On Montag, 25. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I removed that sentence completely from the description and...
[...]
...renamed the package to jdownloader-installer before you sent this
mail.
Thanks!
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 13:13 +0100 schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
Could you instead package jdownloader itself?
I tried, but failed miserable. Some libraries needs to be packaged and
the upstream build system needs to be bent
On 03/25/2013 07:59 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 01:29:13PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 13:13 +0100 schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
Could you instead package jdownloader itself?
I tried, but failed miserable. Some libraries needs to be packaged
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org
* Package name: jdownloader
Version : 0.9.581 / 0.4
Upstream Author : AppWork UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
* URL : http://jdownloader.org/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Java
Section
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks for working on this.
Version : 0.9.581 / 0.4
Any chance to get jdownloader2?
This package contains only a dektop file and a script, which will download
and
launch the latest JDownloader. The downloaded files will be stored in
~/.jdownloader by default.
I
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 13:13 +0100 schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks for working on this.
Version : 0.9.581 / 0.4
Any chance to get jdownloader2?
I have no plans for it. Patches to the downloader script to support
jdownloader2 beta are welcome.
This
Hi Benjamin,
Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org writes:
I tried, but failed miserable. Some libraries needs to be packaged and
the upstream build system needs to be bent to build on Debian. I would
love to ditch the launcher and replace it with a proper package. This is
a lot of work. Until
Hi Michael,
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
Hi Benjamin,
Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org writes:
I tried, but failed miserable. Some libraries needs to be packaged and
the upstream build system needs to be bent to build on Debian. I would
love to
13 matches
Mail list logo
