On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 12:44 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Sunday 30 June 2013 11:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+multipath-tools (0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7+stable1) stable-proposed-updates;
urgency=low
That version number won't work, for a couple of reasons - not least
because it's
On Sunday 30 June 2013 11:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+multipath-tools (0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7+stable1) stable-proposed-updates;
urgency=low
That version number won't work, for a couple of reasons - not least
because it's _higher_ than the version you uploaded to unstable.
Please use
On 2013-07-01 09:14, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Sunday 30 June 2013 11:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+multipath-tools (0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7+stable1) stable-proposed-updates;
urgency=low
That version number won't work, for a couple of reasons - not least
because it's _higher_ than the
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 13:13 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:52 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Getting the fixes in to sid would be appreciated in any case, so that
we can look at a p-u update for 7.2.
I will
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:31:02PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013 01:13 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:52 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, the window for getting fixes in
On Tuesday 11 June 2013 01:13 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:52 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, the window for getting fixes in to the upcoming point
release closed yesterday.
Getting the fixes
On 2013-06-13 18:01, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013 01:13 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:52 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, the window for getting fixes in to the upcoming
point
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:52 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, the window for getting fixes in to the upcoming point
release closed yesterday.
Getting the fixes in to sid would be appreciated in any case, so that
we can look
On Sunday 09 June 2013 11:28 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I can't see anything on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/multipath-tools.html so I'm assuming
this isn't going to make the first point release next weekend?
Attached are the 2 patches that need to be added.
I'm slightly
On 2013-06-10 15:21, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Sunday 09 June 2013 11:28 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I can't see anything on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/multipath-tools.html so I'm
assuming
this isn't going to make the first point release next
weekend?
[...]
Ritesh, if these
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, the window for getting fixes in to the upcoming point
release closed yesterday.
Getting the fixes in to sid would be appreciated in any case, so that
we can look at a p-u update for 7.2.
I will get it done for sid
On Sunday 09 June 2013 05:28 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I can't see anything on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/multipath-tools.html so I'm assuming
this isn't going to make the first point release next weekend?
Attached are the 2 patches that need to be added.
My build is failing for some
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 17:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Sunday 09 June 2013 05:28 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I can't see anything on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/multipath-tools.html so I'm assuming
this isn't going to make the first point release next weekend?
Attached are
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 12:54:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 17:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Sunday 09 June 2013 05:28 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I can't see anything on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/multipath-tools.html so I'm assuming
this isn't
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:55:33PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Saturday 25 May 2013 05:13 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I've just hit this myself upgrading a server to wheezy and can't see any
sign of more recent packages in the archive yet. Is it likely this will
happen in time for
On Saturday 25 May 2013 05:13 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I've just hit this myself upgrading a server to wheezy and can't see any
sign of more recent packages in the archive yet. Is it likely this will
happen in time for the first point release next month?
Yes. THis should go into s-p-u. I
On Monday 8th April 2013 22:04 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 08 April 2013 02:43 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
Just to re-confirm, is the actual bug, that was initially reported by
Guy, is that also resolved?
Yes the bug is resolved. No more errors when update-initramfs -u
Thank you,
Just to re-confirm, is the actual bug, that was initially reported by
Guy, is that also resolved?
Yes the bug is resolved. No more errors when update-initramfs -u
Thank you,
--
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Monday 08 April 2013 02:43 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
Just to re-confirm, is the actual bug, that was initially reported by
Guy, is that also resolved?
Yes the bug is resolved. No more errors when update-initramfs -u
Thank you,
Thank you for confirming.
Given that we are in deep freeze now,
Le 02/04/2013 20:19, Ritesh Raj Sarraf a écrit :
To work around it, you will have to brute force part of the
installation. Attached with this email is the new initscirpt which has
the fix. You need to take this initscript and overwrite it to the one in
/etc/init.d/
Once you do that, you should
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 06:56 PM, matthew pideil wrote:
Thanks, it works now.
LM05q:~# dpkg -l |grep multipath
ii multipath-tools0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7 ...
ii multipath-tools-boot 0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7 ...
Thank you Matthew.
Just to re-confirm, is the
Hello,
I tried your packages without results :
LM05q:~/tmp# LANG=C dpkg -i *deb
(Reading database ... 31699 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace kpartx 0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7 (using
kpartx_0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement kpartx ...
On Tuesday 02 April 2013 08:27 PM, matthew pideil wrote:
Hello,
I tried your packages without results :
LM05q:~/tmp# LANG=C dpkg -i *deb
(Reading database ... 31699 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace kpartx 0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7 (using
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:49:54PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 02 April 2013 08:27 PM, matthew pideil wrote:
Okay!! It is a tricky situation now. The old, buggy version, has the bug
that you cannot stop the daemon. When the dpkg installer calls it with
the stop target, it
On Friday 29 March 2013 01:04 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Can you paste the logs when you hit the command?
The init script denies stopping the daemon since root in on multipath.
But I guess, your installation would have completed. Can you also paste
the output of dpkg -l | grep -i
Le 29/03/2013 08:20, Ritesh Raj Sarraf a écrit :
On Friday 29 March 2013 01:04 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Can you paste the logs when you hit the command?
The init script denies stopping the daemon since root in on multipath.
But I guess, your installation would have completed. Can you
On Friday 29 March 2013 01:46 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
multipath-tools_0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7_amd64.deb) ...
[] Root is on a multipathed device, multipathd can not be
stopped:invoke-rc.d: initscript multipath-tools, action stop failed.
dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned
On Saturday 30 March 2013 01:13 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Friday 29 March 2013 01:46 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
multipath-tools_0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7_amd64.deb) ...
[] Root is on a multipathed device, multipathd can not be
stopped:invoke-rc.d: initscript multipath-tools, action stop
reassign 704073 multipath-tools-boot
thanks
* Ritesh Raj Sarraf [Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 10:58:20AM +0530]:
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 10:03 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
I get this error when upgrading from squeeze to wheezy
on a boot on san (ibm ds4700)
update-initramfs: Generating
On Thursday 28 March 2013 04:08 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
I can't see a reason why this would fail. I suspect it to be an
initramfs problem.
Looks like /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-top/multipath is
missing the PREREQ/prereqs header (see e.g. initramfs-tools(8)), so
set this up (so
On 28/03/2013 16:55, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Thursday 28 March 2013 04:08 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
I can't see a reason why this would fail. I suspect it to be an
initramfs problem.
Looks like /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-top/multipath is
missing the PREREQ/prereqs header (see
On Thursday 28 March 2013 11:10 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
Hi,
Thank you Ritesh,
I don't know how to test those packages. I try dpkg -i *deb
but multipath-tools refuse to upgrade because / is
multipathed ...
I can make some tests, my server is not a production server ...
Can you paste the
Package: multipath-tools-boot
Version: 0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-6
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
I get this error when upgrading from squeeze to wheezy
on a boot on san (ibm ds4700)
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-4-amd64
reassign 704073 initramfs-tools
thanks
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 10:03 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
I get this error when upgrading from squeeze to wheezy
on a boot on san (ibm ds4700)
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-4-amd64
34 matches
Mail list logo
