Bug#706761: override: dynare:math/extra, octave-audio:math/extra, octave-benchmark:math/extra, octave-bim:math/extra, octave-communications:math/extra, octave-control:math/extra, octave-data-smoothing

2013-09-25 Thread Thomas Weber
Hi Sébastien, On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:20:23PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: 2013/6/16 Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org: Could ftpmasters please indicate how they want to proceed here? Actually, the preferred solution would be to move octave to optional. We are currently part of the glpk

Bug#706761: override: dynare:math/extra, octave-audio:math/extra, octave-benchmark:math/extra, octave-bim:math/extra, octave-communications:math/extra, octave-control:math/extra, octave-data-smoothing

2013-09-25 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le mercredi 25 septembre 2013 à 08:42 +0200, Thomas Weber a écrit : Hi Sébastien, On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:20:23PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: 2013/6/16 Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org: Could ftpmasters please indicate how they want to proceed here? Actually, the preferred solution

Bug#706761: override: dynare:math/extra, octave-audio:math/extra, octave-benchmark:math/extra, octave-bim:math/extra, octave-communications:math/extra, octave-control:math/extra, octave-data-smoothing

2013-06-16 Thread Thomas Weber
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 03:24:49PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org writes: Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5. Is there any reason why octave has Priority: extra

Bug#706761: override: dynare:math/extra, octave-audio:math/extra, octave-benchmark:math/extra, octave-bim:math/extra, octave-communications:math/extra, octave-control:math/extra, octave-data-smoothing

2013-05-08 Thread Thomas Weber
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 03:24:49PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org writes: Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5. Is there any reason why octave has Priority: extra

Bug#706761: override: dynare:math/extra, octave-audio:math/extra, octave-benchmark:math/extra, octave-bim:math/extra, octave-communications:math/extra, octave-control:math/extra, octave-data-smoothing

2013-05-04 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-octave-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear FTPmasters, Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5. Thanks, -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :Debian

Bug#706761: override: dynare:math/extra, octave-audio:math/extra, octave-benchmark:math/extra, octave-bim:math/extra, octave-communications:math/extra, octave-control:math/extra, octave-data-smoothing

2013-05-04 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org writes: Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5. Is there any reason why octave has Priority: extra and not optional? Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#706761: override: dynare:math/extra, octave-audio:math/extra, octave-benchmark:math/extra, octave-bim:math/extra, octave-communications:math/extra, octave-control:math/extra, octave-data-smoothing

2013-05-04 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Le samedi 04 mai 2013 à 15:24 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org writes: Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5. Is there any reason why octave has Priority: extra and