Hi Sébastien,
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:20:23PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
2013/6/16 Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org:
Could ftpmasters please indicate how they want to proceed here?
Actually, the preferred solution would be to move octave to optional.
We are currently part of the glpk
Le mercredi 25 septembre 2013 à 08:42 +0200, Thomas Weber a écrit :
Hi Sébastien,
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:20:23PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
2013/6/16 Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org:
Could ftpmasters please indicate how they want to proceed here?
Actually, the preferred solution
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 03:24:49PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org writes:
Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on
octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5.
Is there any reason why octave has Priority: extra
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 03:24:49PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org writes:
Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on
octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5.
Is there any reason why octave has Priority: extra
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-octave-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear FTPmasters,
Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on
octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5.
Thanks,
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian
Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org writes:
Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on
octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5.
Is there any reason why octave has Priority: extra and not optional?
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le samedi 04 mai 2013 à 15:24 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org writes:
Please downgrade these packages to priority extra, since they depend on
octave (which has priority extra), see Policy §2.5.
Is there any reason why octave has Priority: extra and
7 matches
Mail list logo