On 2014-01-21 22:12, Francois Marier wrote:
On 2014-01-21 at 18:20:32, intrigeri wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote (23 Sep 2013 04:02:26 GMT) :
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-06-09):
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy
it's been 3+ months now.
... and now 7+ months.
Sorry, I've
On 2015-01-17 at 12:14:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It doesn't look like anything happened in the meantime.
Do we know what's required to make the package work with the current
iceweasel in wheezy?
Now that stable and unstable are tracking the same version of iceweasel, I'm
guessing we need to
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (23 Sep 2013 04:02:26 GMT) :
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-06-09):
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy
it's been 3+ months now.
... and now 7+ months.
Is it still compatible with Iceweasel 10.0, which is still in stable
for the moment at least?
On 2014-01-21 at 18:20:32, intrigeri wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote (23 Sep 2013 04:02:26 GMT) :
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-06-09):
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy
it's been 3+ months now.
... and now 7+ months.
Sorry, I've obviously dropped the ball here.
If
Hi Francois,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-06-09):
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy
it's been 3+ months now.
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 19:13 +1200, Francois Marier wrote:
Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update.
It's currently not actually made it to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update.
The version of iceweasel-vimperator that's in stable is not compatible with
Iceweasel 17 and the security team has suggested I
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 19:13 +1200, Francois Marier wrote:
Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update.
It's currently not actually made it to stable itself fwiw, as it FTBFS
on several architectures.
The version of iceweasel-vimperator that's
7 matches
Mail list logo
