Hi,
Adam Conrad wrote (23 Mar 2014 20:03:12 GMT) :
Not fixing a bug isn't the way to get rid of it.
I agree. My wording was not appropriate, and I'm sorry for the bad
feelings I may have caused.
Hoping to clarify a bit:
1. I'll try to go on playing the intermediate between the relevant
clone 724469 -1
retitle -1 libglib-object-introspection-perl: FTBFS on 64-bit big-endian
architectures
severity -1 important
found -1 0.020-2
close 724469 0.020-2
thanks
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 01:00:19PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
intrigeri wrote (26 Mar 2014 11:25:38 GMT) :
2. I want Jessie
Hi,
Lennart Sorensen wrote (22 Mar 2014 12:31:00 GMT) :
Patch works for powerpc and someone else already reported it working
for powerpcspe.
Adam Conrad wrote (22 Mar 2014 16:20:23 GMT) :
Works fine for me on powerpc,
Thanks a lot for testing!
I've uploaded libglib-object-introspection-perl
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:33:32AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
Any s390x porter planning to work on this? (And if so, ETA?)
Care to share the results of your own findings? You know where the
problem is located and you obviously know zelenka.d.o.
Bastian
--
Power is danger.
-- The
Hi,
Bastian Blank wrote (23 Mar 2014 10:04:34 GMT) :
Care to share the results of your own findings?
Unfortunately, I don't have the skills needed to work on this problem
myself, so there is no such thing to share. The best I can do is to go
on forwarding patches and test results between
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
hopefully take care of this porting problem.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:33:32AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
I'd rather not drop s390x from the list of architectures this package
is built for, but this RC bug has now been around for 6 months, and at
some point I'll want to get rid of it.
Not fixing a bug isn't the way to get rid of it.
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
hopefully take care of this porting problem.
I'd like to see this RC bug fixed eventually, and I still hope this
can be done
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
hopefully take care of this porting problem.
I'd like to see this RC
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
AFAICT the latest patch proposed by upstream on February 9 [1] has
been tested on mips only. My understanding is that upstream has been
waiting for more test results since then. Can anyone please test this
on other big-endian
Brian Manning wrote (17 Jan 2014 19:03:10 GMT) :
Roderich Schupp updated the ticket [1] with comments about the patch
this morning.
Maybe the discussion about this patch and other fixes for this issue
could be moved to the RT ticket?
[...]
[1] https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Brian Manning wrote (16 Jan 2014 16:43:09 GMT) :
There's already a bug in RT for this, with a patch, and a similar
statement about 64-bit big endian architectures;
Thanks for the pointer, and sorry for not having
Hi,
since 0.015, some of the Glib-Object-Introspection tests fail on all
big-endian architectures supported by Debian.
I am attaching the original bug report. More info can be found at
http://bugs.debian.org/724469, including a patch that apparently fixes
the problem on 32-bit big endian
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:18 AM, intrigeri intrigeri+deb...@boum.org wrote:
Hi,
since 0.015, some of the Glib-Object-Introspection tests fail on all
big-endian architectures supported by Debian.
I am attaching the original bug report. More info can be found at
http://bugs.debian.org/724469,
Hi,
Brian Manning wrote (16 Jan 2014 16:43:09 GMT) :
There's already a bug in RT for this, with a patch, and a similar
statement about 64-bit big endian architectures;
Thanks for the pointer, and sorry for not having looked at RT first.
I haven't checked to see if the two patches are the
Roland Stigge wrote (09 Jan 2014 08:37:00 GMT) :
Patch works on powerpcspe, thanks!
Thanks everyone for the report, the patch and the testing.
I'll forward this upstream soonish.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint
Patch works on powerpcspe, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
I have attached a patch resolving reported issue on mips architecture.
We believe that this fix will work also on other 32-bit big endian
architectures, but additional work will be needed for 64-bit big endian.
Could someone, please test this patch on other big endian architectures.
Best
Package: libglib-object-introspection-perl
Version: 0.015-1
Severity: important
libglib-object-introspection-perl fails to build on all big-endian
architectures with the following test failures:
# Failed test at t/00-basic-types.t line 15.
# got: '-1'
# expected: '-127'
#
19 matches
Mail list logo
