Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
In the Debian package, the instrumentation is only present in the debug
build (install dbus-1-dbg and add
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dbus-1.0/debug-build/lib to the
LD_LIBRARY_PATH), not in the build that is normally used by the OS.
Huh, why isn't the
On 25/06/14 00:05, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Yeah, I *did* notice that my changes won't just magically make things
better for dbus; it would, in fact, require patching configure.ac there
as well. However, what little mention I see of the pkg-config file on
valgrind's bug tracker is skeptical
On mar, giu 24, 2014 at 07:05:12 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Alessandro Ghedini gh...@debian.org writes:
On mar, giu 24, 2014 at 09:33:51 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Well, I think I've figured it out; there are really *two* packages
wanting to be split off, an Arch:all package and an
Control: tags -1 + patch
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
On 15/12/13 23:22, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
While I still think this would be nice, it turned out to be a bit
more difficult to implement (basically the pkg-config file is
generated at build time, and it can't be created if the
On mar, giu 24, 2014 at 09:33:51 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Control: tags -1 + patch
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
On 15/12/13 23:22, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
While I still think this would be nice, it turned out to be a bit
more difficult to implement (basically the
Alessandro Ghedini gh...@debian.org writes:
On mar, giu 24, 2014 at 09:33:51 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Well, I think I've figured it out; there are really *two* packages
wanting to be split off, an Arch:all package and an Arch:any package.
This doesn't really solve anything though.
On 15/12/13 23:22, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
While I still think this would be nice, it turned out to be a bit
more difficult to implement (basically the pkg-config file is
generated at build time, and it can't be created if the configure
stage fails).
Thanks for looking at this, anyway.
You
Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed -1 valgrind/1:3.9.0-2
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:22:21PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Control: tags -1 pending
On mar, dic 03, 2013 at 11:56:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
Package: valgrind
Version: 1:3.9.0-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be
Control: tags -1 pending
On mar, dic 03, 2013 at 11:56:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
Package: valgrind
Version: 1:3.9.0-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if valgrind could ship memcheck.h and friends, and
valgrind.pc, in a new valgrind-dev or valgrind-headers or something on all
Package: valgrind
Version: 1:3.9.0-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if valgrind could ship memcheck.h and friends, and
valgrind.pc, in a new valgrind-dev or valgrind-headers or something on all
architectures; then packages that consume them, like dbus, wouldn't have
to stay in sync with
10 matches
Mail list logo
