Bug#736648: RFP: icu4j-49 -- a library for Unicode support and internationalization

2014-01-27 Thread Hilko Bengen
* Hilko Bengen: That being said, it might be possible to package a newer version of icu4j instead (I haven't tried building Lucene4 against anything newer than 49.1.) Upstream is at 52.1 right now. Meh. As it turns out, this doesn't work. Some APIs were removed between 49 and 52 and Lucene

Bug#736648: RFP: icu4j-49 -- a library for Unicode support and internationalization

2014-01-26 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Also worth noting, Lucene 4.7 will use icu4j 52: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4381 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#736648: RFP: icu4j-49 -- a library for Unicode support and internationalization

2014-01-25 Thread Hilko Bengen
Control: block 736644 by -1 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: icu4j-49 Version : 49.1 Upstream Author : ICU project * URL or Web page : http://icu-project.org/ * License : ICU Description : Library for Unicode support and internationalization icu4j-49

Bug#736648: RFP: icu4j-49 -- a library for Unicode support and internationalization

2014-01-25 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Would it be possible to upgrade the existing icu4j package instead? japi-compliance-checked reports a compatibility of 80%. Here are the issues found by clirr: ERROR: 8001: com.ibm.icu.impl.ByteBuffer: Class com.ibm.icu.impl.ByteBuffer removed ERROR: 7002: com.ibm.icu.impl.CharTrie: Method

Bug#736648: RFP: icu4j-49 -- a library for Unicode support and internationalization

2014-01-25 Thread Hilko Bengen
* Emmanuel Bourg: Would it be possible to upgrade the existing icu4j package instead? japi-compliance-checked reports a compatibility of 80%. Here are the issues found by clirr: ERROR: 8001: com.ibm.icu.impl.ByteBuffer: Class com.ibm.icu.impl.ByteBuffer removed [...] To me, this looks

Bug#736648: RFP: icu4j-49 -- a library for Unicode support and internationalization

2014-01-25 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-01-26 01:15, Hilko Bengen wrote: * Emmanuel Bourg: Would it be possible to upgrade the existing icu4j package instead? japi-compliance-checked reports a compatibility of 80%. Here are the issues found by clirr: ERROR: 8001: com.ibm.icu.impl.ByteBuffer: Class