Bug#740893: Patch for python-coverage bug #740893

2017-08-02 Thread Ryan Attard
Sorry, my previous response was a little unclear: > Can't you just drop the libjs* recommends and install the stuff in the source package onto the target system? My response was definitely more aimed at the python-coverage maintainers than the libjs-jquery-hotkeys maintainers. Why doesn't

Bug#740893: Patch for python-coverage bug #740893

2017-08-02 Thread Ryan Attard
I've been struggling with this bug, but I'm a little confused by this bug report and the response from the maintainers. The source package has these JS files under in coverage/htmlfiles (with what I'm assuming is the compatible/tested version), why aren't they shipped in the debian package? It

Bug#740893: Patch for python-coverage bug #740893

2017-05-25 Thread Eevel Weezel
I did some further testing around changing the version of jquery.hotkeys.js in libjs-jquery-hotkeys to the upstream jeresig version, and behavior of the various libraries that depend on it. For python-coverage, the bug is still there, with the addition of a new error related to differences in

Bug#740893: Patch for python-coverage bug #740893

2017-05-23 Thread Ben Finney
On 23-May-2017, Eevel Weezel wrote: > I'm attaching a patch. This will remove the bundled version of the js > libraries, allowing python-coverage to use the system libraries. Thank you for the patch. Is that needed, though? The package already omits those files from the HTML report, via an

Bug#740893: Patch for python-coverage bug #740893

2017-05-23 Thread Eevel Weezel
Hello Maintainer, I'm attaching a patch. This will remove the bundled version of the js libraries, allowing python-coverage to use the system libraries. Best, Heather python-coverage_diff Description: Binary data