Hi,
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-03-06):
Past blockers:
debian-installer-utils
eglibc
Current blockers:
linux (ftbfs already uploaded, needs builds + aging).
ufsutils
Current nice-to-have:
l10n updates for a bunch of d-i packages.
(I may be forgetting things,
On 16/03/2014 17:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
feel free to switch to userland 10 whenever you feel
it's ready, and to commit stuff in debian-installer's master branch.
Excellent, thanks. I'm a bit wary of doing that on sunday afternoon, so assuming
everyone's ok with that, I'll upload userland 10
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140208
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Using the weekly build kfreebsd-amd64 XFCE ISO, it is impossible to
install the current Testing distribution. I tried it both within
Virtualbox on a Linux machine and within a Hyper-V VM on Windows. The
Jan Henke jan.he...@taujhe.de (2014-03-06):
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140208
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Using the weekly build kfreebsd-amd64 XFCE ISO, it is impossible to
install the current Testing distribution. I tried it both within
Virtualbox on a Linux
Am 06.03.2014 10:53, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Jan Henke jan.he...@taujhe.de (2014-03-06):
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140208
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Using the weekly build kfreebsd-amd64 XFCE ISO, it is impossible to
install the current Testing distribution. I
Jan Henke jan.he...@taujhe.de (2014-03-06):
tty4 gives 3 probably related lines:
* update-dev: warning unable to find udevadm; skipping
* partman: mkfs.ufs: DIOCGMEDIASIZE:
* partman: Inappropiate ioctl for device
Thanks. Hopefully BSD folks will handle that.
Extracting the log files
On 06/03/2014 11:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Jan Henke jan.he...@taujhe.de (2014-03-06):
tty4 gives 3 probably related lines:
* update-dev: warning unable to find udevadm; skipping
* partman: mkfs.ufs: DIOCGMEDIASIZE:
* partman: Inappropiate ioctl for device
Thanks. Hopefully BSD folks
On 06/03/14 15:01, Robert Millan wrote:
I'm still waiting for feedback before uploading FreeBSD 10 userland to sid.
If I don't receive any I could still upload it, but Steven said he wanted to
test some things first. I'd prefer if he has a chance to do it.
I've been really unproductive
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (2014-03-06):
That's #737580, which is fixed in 10.0-2 (experimental).
Looking at 05_wipe_otherfs.patch in both versions, it looks like v9
could easily be fixed in the same way? If so, why not do that?
Staying at kfreebsd 9 for the jessie alpha 1 images looks like
On 06/03/14 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Staying at kfreebsd 9 for the jessie alpha 1 images looks like a nice
idea
I think that would be nice; having pre-built d-i images with kfreebsd-8
was very handy when introducing kfreebsd-9 for wheezy. But when is
alpha1 scheduled to happen?
We
On 06/03/2014 15:05, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 06/03/14 15:01, Robert Millan wrote:
I'm still waiting for feedback before uploading FreeBSD 10 userland to sid.
If I don't receive any I could still upload it, but Steven said he wanted to
test some things first. I'd prefer if he has a chance
On 06/03/2014 15:22, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
the ioctl warnings in partman
Just FYI, I once traced those to freebsd.c in libparted. It's trivial to remove
the warning, but I'm not sure if that could (maybe!) be hiding legit errors.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 06/03/2014 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Looking at 05_wipe_otherfs.patch in both versions, it looks like v9
could easily be fixed in the same way? If so, why not do that?
Fine with me, though I got no time to take care of 9.x branch. I barely
keep up with 10.0-related work...
Staying at
On 06/03/2014 15:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Current blockers:
linux (ftbfs already uploaded, needs builds + aging).
ufsutils
There's also the mfsroot size problem on kfreebsd-i386 (I sent a patch but
couldn't
find time to test it, I'm afraid...)
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-03-06):
On 06/03/14 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Staying at kfreebsd 9 for the jessie alpha 1 images looks like a nice
idea
I think that would be nice; having pre-built d-i images with kfreebsd-8
was very handy when introducing kfreebsd-9 for
On 06/03/14 15:27, Robert Millan wrote:
* if the netmask from the DHCP lease is properly set [I suspect I was
seeing an issue in ifupdown however]
Sorry, didn't check this one.
That turned out to be isc-dhcp bug #677985, fixed in jessie/sid, only
affecting wheezy now.
Regards,
--
Steven
On 06/03/2014 15:37, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
That turned out to be isc-dhcp bug #677985, fixed in jessie/sid, only
affecting wheezy now.
So FreeBSD 10 userland is good to go then? Is there anything left?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
17 matches
Mail list logo
