tag 741190 pending
thanks
I have just added the patch to the repo, sorry for the delay.
Kinds regards, Lisandro.
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Lisandro,
On 4-Apr-14, at 2:18 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2014 11:46:23 John David Anglin wrote:
On 4/3/2014 10:19 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
OK, here's what upstream replied wrt the patch:
Sorry, there's no way we can accept
On 4/3/2014 10:19 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
OK, here's what upstream replied wrt the patch:
Sorry, there's no way we can accept this patch. It is totally binary-
incompatible for PA-RISC since it changes the size of QAtomicInt.
Debian will need to keep the patch
On Friday 04 April 2014 11:46:23 John David Anglin wrote:
On 4/3/2014 10:19 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
OK, here's what upstream replied wrt the patch:
Sorry, there's no way we can accept this patch. It is totally binary-
incompatible for PA-RISC since it changes
OK, here's what upstream replied wrt the patch:
Sorry, there's no way we can accept this patch. It is totally binary-
incompatible for PA-RISC since it changes the size of QAtomicInt.
Debian will need to keep the patch and ensure that everything is built with
the patch applied (or
On 22-Mar-14, at 11:32 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Patch pushed upstream, not it's just time to wait for Thiago to
check it :)
Thanks for the upstream push.
This is reference for m68k change:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660963 #58
Dave
--
John
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 19:10:25 John David Anglin wrote:
[snip]
I'm fully willing to make the contribution available under any GNU
License Terms.
Or BSD-license? Would that help? (Maybe not because of the copyright
licensing?)
I have no objection to this approach and could try
On 22-Mar-14, at 9:38 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 19:10:25 John David Anglin wrote:
[snip]
I'm fully willing to make the contribution available under any GNU
License Terms.
Or BSD-license? Would that help? (Maybe not because of the copyright
On Saturday 22 March 2014 22:42:02 John David Anglin wrote:
[snip]
AVR32? OK, did you write this patch or did you just copied another
header from
Qt source and applied it to parisc? In case you have done the
latest, did you
modify anything? Please try to be as verbose as possible, it
Patch pushed upstream, not it's just time to wait for Thiago to check it :)
--
Dadme voto electrónico y con una terminal os haré presidente.
el.machi
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On 03/12/2014 03:27 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
I also don't want to become a Qt developer. I have enough on my
plate with GCC and Linux.
Helge, do you have any thoughts about this?
I would be interested to come up with a good fix, and even submit it via
the required CLA, but right now I'm
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 21:57:37 Helge Deller wrote:
On 03/12/2014 03:27 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
I also don't want to become a Qt developer. I have enough on my
plate with GCC and Linux.
Helge, do you have any thoughts about this?
I would be interested to come up with a good
Hi Lisandro,
On 03/12/2014 10:18 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
We try our best to avoid any delta with upstream, both to get an upstream ACK
both the patch to prevent possible problems and to avoid to let the patch
rotten in our repos.
Fully understandable.
So the best
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 22:39:17 Helge Deller wrote:
Hi Lisandro,
On 03/12/2014 10:18 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
We try our best to avoid any delta with upstream, both to get an upstream
ACK both the patch to prevent possible problems and to avoid to let the
patch
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 18:59:25 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 22:39:17 Helge Deller wrote:
Hi Lisandro,
On 03/12/2014 10:18 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
We try our best to avoid any delta with upstream, both to get an
Let me offer you another idea: if you really can't go trough gerrit I would
need the author of the patch to send a signed mail to this bug report sating
that he puts the patch under some BSD-like license (Expat comes to my mind).
In this way I can at least try to push it myself as 3rd party
On 12-Mar-14, at 4:57 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
On 03/12/2014 03:27 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
I also don't want to become a Qt developer. I have enough on my
plate with GCC and Linux.
Helge, do you have any thoughts about this?
I would be interested to come up with a good fix, and even
On Monday 10 March 2014 10:52:23 John David Anglin wrote:
On 3/10/2014 9:06 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
tag 741190 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Jhon! This seems an interesting bugfix for Qt4, if there any chance for
you to push it upstream?
As it stands, the patch is only
On 11-Mar-14, at 10:50 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
I think not, so the best thing here would be to you to push it
upstream.
Please note I would really love to do it myself, but I can't due to
Qt's CLA.
You need to sign up in upstream's gerrit instance and push the patch
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 18:52:27 John David Anglin wrote:
On 11-Mar-14, at 10:50 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
I think not, so the best thing here would be to you to push it
upstream.
Please note I would really love to do it myself, but I can't due to
Qt's CLA.
You
tag 741190 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Jhon! This seems an interesting bugfix for Qt4, if there any chance for you
to push it upstream?
--
With great power comes great responsibility.
Peter Parker's uncle.
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
On 3/10/2014 9:06 AM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
tag 741190 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Jhon! This seems an interesting bugfix for Qt4, if there any chance for you
to push it upstream?
As it stands, the patch is only applicable to linux. On parisc,
kernel support is required to
Package: qt4-x11
Severity: important
The smokeqt package fails to build on hppa. See:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708200
Will attach fix to this bug report. I would appreciate your
adding it to the set of packages for qt4-x11.
Dave
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Attached patch.
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
qt4-x11-parisc-atomic.diff
Description: Binary data
24 matches
Mail list logo
