On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:26:42AM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > The alternative of > > | Updated checklists are provided by new package versions. > > is a bad idea since all packages have new versions, but the default > > assumption in Debian is that they won't reach stable, and this doesn't > > explicitly override that default. How about something like: > > > > New versions updating the checklists included in the stable release > > will be provided via security updates. > > > > But it would help if we had a cover term meaning "security updates in > > the strict sense, LTS updates, and whatever other kinds are > > appropriate". Maybe "support updates"? "Special updates"? Maybe > > even > > > > New versions of this package with updated checklists will be provided > > via standard and/or extended security support. > > We should pick to that one. Moritz, short ACK oder NACK since this > introduces the "extended" term instead of "LTS"?
Fine with me. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org