On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:23:51PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > Just to add more information to the bug report: the Gentoo developer who
> > tried to get libiccjpeg into lcms also tried (and apparently failed) to
> > get it into libjpeg-turbo:
> >
> Just to add more information to the bug report: the Gentoo developer who
> tried to get libiccjpeg into lcms also tried (and apparently failed) to
> get it into libjpeg-turbo:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/libjpeg-turbo/mailman/message/30387709/
>
> Thomas
Hi Michael,
I am currently
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:25:46AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> upstream is unlikely to ship a libiccjpeg library, as lcms2 is agnostic
> with respect to graphic file formats and iccjpeg.c is only about jpeg.
> Do you know how other distributions handle this? I just looked and
>
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:26:44AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
package: src:lcms2
forwarded 747839 https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS/issues/31
thanks
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 09:50:21PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Hi, chromium currently uses an embedded copy of iccjpeg.c. It would
be
package: src:lcms2
forwarded 747839 https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS/issues/31
thanks
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 09:50:21PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Hi, chromium currently uses an embedded copy of iccjpeg.c. It would
be preferable for lcms to ship libiccjpeg packages that could be used
for
package: src:lcms2
severity: wishlist
Hi, chromium currently uses an embedded copy of iccjpeg.c. It would
be preferable for lcms to ship libiccjpeg packages that could be used
for linking against.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
6 matches
Mail list logo
