On 07/09/14 14:11, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-08-31 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
[...]
almost the final ones:
Hello,
This seems to be the final one for some time:
nmu git-annex 5.20140831 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against
On 2014-08-31 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
[...]
almost the final ones:
Hello,
This seems to be the final one for some time:
nmu git-annex 5.20140831 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
The transition seems to be almost done,
On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
[...]
nmu libccrtp_2.0.9-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
almost the final ones:
nmu gtklp_1.2.7-2.3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu samhain_3.1.0-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu suricata_2.0.3-1 . ALL . -m
On 2014-08-31 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
[...]
nmu gtklp_1.2.7-2.3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
Nevermind about this one, it is only in sid and has an open FTBFS bug.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to
On 31/08/14 16:26, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-08-03 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
[...]
nmu libccrtp_2.0.9-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
almost the final ones:
nmu gtklp_1.2.7-2.3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
Not done as you said.
nmu samhain_3.1.0-6 .
On 03/08/14 19:39, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-07-18 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote:
nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
That one failed everywhere. I have opened a serious bug for it.
Hello,
I
On 2014-07-17 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
there is another binnmu candidate:
[...]
some new ones:
[...]
and more:
nmu sipwitch_1.6.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu libccaudio2_2.1.3-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against
On 2014-07-18 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote:
nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
That one failed everywhere. I have opened a serious bug for it.
Hello,
I just had a successful local build, could you
On 03/08/14 19:14, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-07-17 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
there is another binnmu candidate:
[...]
some new ones:
[...]
and more:
nmu sipwitch_1.6.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
there is another binnmu candidate:
[...]
some new ones:
nmu gobby-infinote_0.4.94-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu pycurl_7.19.3.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against
On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote:
nmu gobby-infinote_0.4.94-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu pycurl_7.19.3.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
Scheduled.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote:
nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
That one failed everywhere. I have opened a serious bug for it.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Good morning,
there is another binnmu candidate:
nmu cadaver 0.23.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
Cadaver does not build-depend directly on gnutls by inherits the
build-dependency from neon27, which was upgraded to gnutls28 and has
propagated to testing.
I could not find any other
On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
Good morning,
there is another binnmu candidate:
nmu cadaver_0.23.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
[...]
actually there is a second one:
nmu libaqbanking_5.4.3beta-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
cu Andreas
--
`What a
On 12/07/14 09:34, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
Good morning,
there is another binnmu candidate:
nmu cadaver_0.23.3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28'
[...]
actually there is a second one:
nmu libaqbanking_5.4.3beta-2 . ALL . -m
On 2014-06-17 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnutls28.html
[...]
These packages lose their gnutls dependency on a rebuild:
nmu libnet-cups-perl_0.61-2 ALL . -m 'Rebuild to drop libgnutls26 dependency'
nmu newsbeuter_2.7-1 ALL .
On 21/06/14 13:28, Andreas Metzler wrote:
nmu libnet-cups-perl_0.61-2 ALL . -m 'Rebuild to drop libgnutls26 dependency'
nmu newsbeuter_2.7-1 ALL . -m 'Rebuild to drop libgnutls26 dependency'
nmu xpp_1.5-cvs20081009-1 ALL . -m 'Rebuild to drop libgnutls26 dependency'
Scheduled. BTW there is
On 2014-06-17 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
BTW there are currently some issues with the gcrypt transition, see e.g.:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pycurl
Are you aware of that? Not sure if that's part of the gnutls
transition or if we should have
On 2014-06-16 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 15/06/14 19:20, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Actually I was wrong, it simply propagated, since libetpan/testing is
using libgnutls26. :-)
Yep, it is done now.
Do you want a tracker for the gnutls26 - gnutls28 transition as
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnutls28.html
On 16/06/14 19:07, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-06-16 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 15/06/14 19:20, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Actually I was wrong, it simply propagated, since
On 15/06/14 19:20, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-06-15 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
On 2014-06-10 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 06/06/14 20:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
Looks like libgadu and wireshark are the only remaining problems.
Good
On 2014-06-10 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 06/06/14 20:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Ah, good point! libgadu seems to be the only problem so far (it
was failing on kbsd and didn't migrate because of that. I have
retried it and it failed again).
Looks like libgadu and
On 2014-06-15 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
On 2014-06-10 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 06/06/14 20:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
Looks like libgadu and wireshark are the only remaining problems.
Good morning,
Which would both be solved now. However
On 06/06/14 20:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Ah, good point! libgadu seems to be the only problem so far (it was failing on
kbsd and didn't migrate because of that. I have retried it and it failed
again).
Looks like libgadu and wireshark are the only remaining problems.
Emilio
--
To
On 05/06/14 20:08, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-06-05 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 29/05/14 08:09, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Okay. So I have got gnutls28 (3.2.14-2) ready for upload (except for
dch -r) If you want to take a look at it the package is available on
On 2014-06-06 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 05/06/14 20:08, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-06-05 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
I was going to ack this, but I see gnutls/exp failed on kbsd-i386.
Just for the archives: I cannot reproduce the error with
On 06/06/14 19:39, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-06-06 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 05/06/14 20:08, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-06-05 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
I was going to ack this, but I see gnutls/exp failed on kbsd-i386.
Just for
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 29/05/14 08:09, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-05-26 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 20:29:18 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
So now we need a libgnutls28 - libgnutls-deb0-28 transition as a
first step. - How should I go about
On 2014-06-05 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
On 29/05/14 08:09, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Okay. So I have got gnutls28 (3.2.14-2) ready for upload (except for
dch -r) If you want to take a look at it the package is available on
people.debian.org in ~ametzler/GNUTLS/.
On 2014-05-26 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 20:29:18 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
So now we need a libgnutls28 - libgnutls-deb0-28 transition as a
first step. - How should I go about this, should a open a separate new
transition bug report?
I think we
On 2014-05-24 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 15:21:12 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
i.e. the library packge name would change to libgnutls-deb0-28. - Any
thoughts about it?
Looks reasonable to me. Thanks!
Hello,
I had uploaded changed packages to
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 20:29:18 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
So now we need a libgnutls28 - libgnutls-deb0-28 transition as a
first step. - How should I go about this, should a open a separate new
transition bug report?
I think we can use this one.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 19:47:48 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Afaik it is not possible to change the versioning scheme and move from
soname.1 foo@0 bar@1 baz@1
to
soname.1 foo@1 bar@1 baz@1
without breaking the ABI, is it?
On 2014-05-24 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
[...]
So we would need to change the binary package name and do a soname bump,
correct?
[...]
Hello,
Which I would do with attached patch, which causes this:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 15:21:12 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-05-24 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote:
[...]
So we would need to change the binary package name and do a soname bump,
correct?
[...]
Hello,
Which I would do with attached patch, which causes this:
On 20/05/14 19:47, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Apparently loading both versions of gnutls in the same process
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to ship jessie
On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Apparently loading both versions of gnutls in the same process leads to
crashes. That screams at bugs
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 19:47:48 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
Apparently loading both versions of
Hello!
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:02:22PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 19:47:48 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 19:04:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to ship jessie without GnuTLS 2.x (gnutls26) as it is
dead upstream and _old_. The last
On 2014-05-19 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:52:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
I would like to ship jessie without GnuTLS 2.x (gnutls26) as it is
dead upstream and _old_. The last upstream release was in February
2013, marking the end of a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to ship jessie without GnuTLS 2.x (gnutls26) as it is
dead upstream and _old_. The last upstream release was in February
2013, marking the end of a multi-year series
43 matches
Mail list logo
