Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-10-13 Thread kittyofthebox
Package: systemd Version: 215-5+b1 Followup-For: Bug #762101 Hi, I would really like to see this issue addressed because in my experience: $ sudo journalctl -l | grep -F 'Network interface NamePolicy= disabled on kernel commandline, ignoring.' | wc -l 24741 It isn't just 3 lines. Kitty --

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-10-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael Biebl em...@michaelbiebl.de [2014-09-21 20:30 +0200]: The reference to NamePolicy refers to [1]. In Debian we decided to make the persistent interface naming explicitly opt-in instead of opt-out via the net.ifnames=0|1 kernel command line parameter. I have not opted-in, but

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-10-07 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 07.10.2014 um 10:45 schrieb martin f krafft: also sprach Michael Biebl em...@michaelbiebl.de [2014-09-21 20:30 +0200]: The reference to NamePolicy refers to [1]. In Debian we decided to make the persistent interface naming explicitly opt-in instead of opt-out via the net.ifnames=0|1 kernel

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-10-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [2014-10-07 14:36 +0200]: No, it's a misunderstanding. You would have to opt-in for the warning message to go away. systemd-networkd expects the new naming policy to be active (because that's the upstream default). If it's not, it assumes you have

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-10-07 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 07.10.2014 um 14:48 schrieb martin f krafft: also sprach Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [2014-10-07 14:36 +0200]: No, it's a misunderstanding. You would have to opt-in for the warning message to go away. systemd-networkd expects the new naming policy to be active (because that's the

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-10-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [2014-10-07 15:12 +0200]: No it is not enabled by default. Fwiw, you can trivially easily check that yourself. (systemctl status and systemctl is-enabled is your friend). Thank you for the hint. And the warning is there to remind the admin that s/he

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-10-07 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 07.10.2014 um 15:16 schrieb martin f krafft: also sprach Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [2014-10-07 15:12 +0200]: It warns you, that the default systemd-networkd configuration makes use of the new interface naming, but that it is not enabled. Keep in mind, that this message is logged by

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-10-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [2014-10-07 15:24 +0200]: The log message is not by us guys, but, as I explained, the result of upstream using a different default value, and because of that, udevd warning about this fact. I hope I don't have to understand this right now. Now, I

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-09-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 18.09.2014 um 14:41 schrieb Matijs van Zuijlen: Package: systemd Version: 215-4 Severity: normal Recently, lines like the following have started appearing in my system logs: Sep 18 12:10:55 walnut systemd-udevd[179]: Network interface NamePolicy= disabled on kernel commandline,

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

2014-09-18 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen
Package: systemd Version: 215-4 Severity: normal Recently, lines like the following have started appearing in my system logs: Sep 18 12:10:55 walnut systemd-udevd[179]: Network interface NamePolicy= disabled on kernel commandline, ignoring. I found `NamePolicy=` in