On 13/11/14 03:29, Russ Allbery wrote:
Tim Wootton t...@tee-jay.demon.co.uk writes:
or just build without the dependency in the 1st place like it used to
be. After all it's not like it adds anything that's essential.
No, including the dependency is the right approach and is consistent with
Tim Wootton t...@tee-jay.demon.co.uk writes:
My understanding was this is the correct approach unless doing so
breaches policy, which this (and apparently many others ) does.
No, priorities for library packages are basically ignored. They've
essentially never changed how we choose compilation
Package: bsdutils
Version: 1:2.25.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
Dear Maintainer,
libsystemd0 dependancy violates constraint at the end of section 2.5
of the policy manual that requires packages not depend on packages
with lower priority..
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Hello Tim Wootton, release-team, et.al.!
Thanks for your bug report.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +, Tim Wootton wrote:
Package: bsdutils
Version: 1:2.25.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
Dear Maintainer,
libsystemd0 dependancy violates constraint at the end of
Am 12.11.2014 um 15:04 schrieb Andreas Henriksson:
Hello Tim Wootton, release-team, et.al.!
Thanks for your bug report.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +, Tim Wootton wrote:
Package: bsdutils
Version: 1:2.25.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
Dear Maintainer,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Hello Tim Wootton, release-team, et.al.!
Thanks for your bug report.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +, Tim Wootton wrote:
Package: bsdutils
Version: 1:2.25.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
Hi,
1752 packages are listed to violate this same policy:
https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=sidlist=main-only-priorityarch=ANY
policy discussion about this is happening at #758234
Riku
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Am 12.11.2014 um 15:35 schrieb Bill Allombert:
It is well settled that priority changes are done throught the distribution
override file and not in the package control file and thus, an error of
priority is not a RC bug in the package.
And that. Adjusting library package priorities is useless
On 12/11/14 14:29, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 12.11.2014 um 15:04 schrieb Andreas Henriksson:
Hello Tim Wootton, release-team, et.al.!
Thanks for your bug report.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +, Tim Wootton wrote:
Package: bsdutils
Version: 1:2.25.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification:
Tim Wootton t...@tee-jay.demon.co.uk writes:
or just build without the dependency in the 1st place like it used to
be. After all it's not like it adds anything that's essential.
No, including the dependency is the right approach and is consistent with
how Debian has always handled issues like
Hi,
Tim Wootton:
or just build without the dependency in the 1st place like it used to be.
After all it's not like it adds anything that's essential.
Most dependencies don't add anything that's essential in the strict
sense. The vast majority of uses of computers aren't essential either,
but
11 matches
Mail list logo
