Hi,
On 2014-11-21 04:56:02 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Oh, so it does. :( I've started looking into fixing this, but I'll
> have to ponder about it to maybe change the behavior the other way
> around :/, because as it stands, and as pointed out by Johannes
> off-BTS there are at least 114
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.21
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Hi,
dpkg fails to configure a second architecture of this package if a
first architecture is already installed:
Package: libbabl-dev
Multi-Arch: same
Source: babl
Version:
Hi!
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 11:43:15 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.21
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
dpkg fails to configure a second architecture of this package if a
first architecture is already
On 2014-11-20 16:51, Guillem Jover wrote:
This is expected behavior in dpkg. Conflics/Breaks/Replaces get an
implicit any arch qualifier, so those make the dependency
unsatisfiable due to the Provides.
If it's intentional, this is fine.
So if there's no other issue besides this, I'm just
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:00:06 +0100 Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
On 2014-11-20 16:51, Guillem Jover wrote:
This is expected behavior in dpkg. Conflics/Breaks/Replaces get an
implicit any arch qualifier, so those make the dependency
unsatisfiable due to the Provides.
thanks
On 2014-11-20 16:51 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 11:43:15 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.21
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
dpkg fails to configure a second architecture of this package
Hi!
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 18:35:51 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-11-20 16:51 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 11:43:15 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.21
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags:
7 matches
Mail list logo