Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-02-23 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 wontfix On 2015-01-06 23:25, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please allow libjpeg9 back in jessie. The removal of libjpeg9 implies the removal of libjpeg-progs which is in

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-02-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-02-02 00:04, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: I am afraid I do not see how removing libjpeg9 from testing is inconsistent with the tech-ctte decision. You need to reread the full decision in context. The very first item of their

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-02-04 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015, Bill Allombert wrote: My understanding was and is still that the CTTE overrided the release team on this point. That's incorrect. At least recently, when the CTTE is overriding people, we have been very explicit about the fact that they are being overridden. [This is

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-02-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-02-04 20:54, Niels Thykier wrote: I believe this makes sense, as decision of the release only affects testing. Accordingly, there is nothing preventing multiple implementations of libjpeg in testing or unstable. Sorry, I made a mistake here. That last part should have read:

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-02-04 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:28:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:54:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: I am sorry you feel that way. I assumed that you were aware, given that you replied to the tech-ctte decision in which our statement was included (in fact, you

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-02-04 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:54:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: I am sorry you feel that way. I assumed that you were aware, given that you replied to the tech-ctte decision in which our statement was included (in fact, you retained it in quoted part of your reply). My understanding was and is

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-02-01 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-01-29 20:40, Bill Allombert wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:32:58PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: [...] I am still not convinced that this is sufficient to turn over the decision to only have one libjpeg implementation in Jessie. The two previous Debian releases had several libjpeg

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-02-01 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: I am afraid I do not see how removing libjpeg9 from testing is inconsistent with the tech-ctte decision. You need to reread the full decision in context. The very first item of their resolution text states that: 1. [...] The

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-01-29 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2015-01-28 00:34, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi, Could you list the features that the turbo-variant is missing, which are present in the current version of libjpeg-progs from Wheezy? Are there any

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-01-29 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:32:58PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2015-01-28 00:34, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi, Could you list the features that the turbo-variant is missing, which are present in

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-01-27 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi, Could you list the features that the turbo-variant is missing, which are present in the current version of libjpeg-progs from Wheezy? Are there any lacking features beyond the SmartScale feature? Yes, there are a number of

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-01-22 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2015-01-06 23:25, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please allow libjpeg9 back in jessie. The removal of libjpeg9 implies the removal of libjpeg-progs which is

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-01-22 Thread Bill Allombert
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Bill, Please forgive me if I misunderstood something; I was not too involved in the libjpeg transition. It is my understanding that there is all utilities / services

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-01-22 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-01-22 19:15, Bill Allombert wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi Bill, Please forgive me if I misunderstood something; I was not too involved in the libjpeg transition. It is my understanding that there is all utilities / services provided by

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

2015-01-06 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please allow libjpeg9 back in jessie. The removal of libjpeg9 implies the removal of libjpeg-progs which is in wheezy and used by a number of users, thus it is not unused. It would be