On Fri, 2015-05-01 05:05:10 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Control: tag -1 - patch
Hi!
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
The one before which is
Hi!
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 19:51:57 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-01 05:05:10 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Control: tag -1 - patch
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Just tried out the
Control: tag -1 - patch
Hi!
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
The one before which is in jessie works fine.
I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:09:16 -0400 Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
control: tag -1 confirmed
control: severity -1 serious
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
The one before which is in jessie
Package: gparted
Version: 0.19.0-2.1
Severity: important
Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
The one before which is in jessie works fine.
I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix
fz:/tmp# gparted
mount: bad option. Note that moving a mount residing under a shared
control: tag -1 confirmed
control: severity -1 serious
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
The one before which is in jessie works fine.
I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix
gparted needs a newer udisks2, see
6 matches
Mail list logo
