On 10 June 2015 at 01:59, Ximin Luo infini...@pwned.gg wrote:
Given the above, I think it would still be good to define SOURCE_DATE as I
originally suggested:
SOURCE_DATE = $(date -d $(dpkg-parsechangelog --count 1 -SDate)
--iso-8601=seconds) # includes the TZ offset
- if the
On 06/06/15 16:39, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Freitag, 5. Juni 2015, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
My vote is for SOURCE_DATE_UTC, and i agree with Brendan that we should
take the opportunity to define this as strictly and narrowly as possible
(i.e. end in a 'Z', none of the other offsets),
Hi,
On Freitag, 5. Juni 2015, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
My vote is for SOURCE_DATE_UTC, and i agree with Brendan that we should
take the opportunity to define this as strictly and narrowly as possible
(i.e. end in a 'Z', none of the other offsets), so that people relying
on it know they're
On Fri 2015-06-05 10:55:34 -0400, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
Any of UTC_SOURCE_DATE, SOURCE_DATE_UTC
My vote is for SOURCE_DATE_UTC, and i agree with Brendan that we should
take the opportunity to define this as strictly and narrowly as possible
(i.e. end in a 'Z', none of the other offsets), so that
4 matches
Mail list logo
