Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 at 08:54:15 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Are there any update on this? AFAICT the upload has /not/ happened yet. I have uploaded this revised diff. As before, I didn't use the DELAYED queues, because this has taken quite long enough already. Regards, S diffstat for

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 14:46:39 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote: > On 06/09/15 10:47, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 09:12:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > >> The short version is, yes the rename is the right thing to do. > > > > I have done this as a

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On 21/09/15 07:54, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 14:46:39 +0100 Simon McVittie >> so my patch is clearly not 100% right. I'll check more thoroughly and >> upload a fixed version later today if nobody else gets there first. > > Are there any update on this? AFAICT the upload has /not/

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On 09/21/2015 08:54 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Is anything blocking the upload (beyond someone doing it)? I'm not aware of anythin blocking. I've been away for a couple of weeks and will care for this later today.

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On 09/21/2015 09:29 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: > I have uploaded this revised diff. Well, that diff should resolve this issue. Thanks, Simon.

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On 06/09/15 10:47, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 09:12:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> The short version is, yes the rename is the right thing to do. > > I have done this as a non-maintainer upload with the attached debdiff. > I haven't used the DELAYED queues, because the

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 09:12:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 21/08/15 08:46, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > > This patch replaces libginac5. This is in line with what the bug report > > says: "Rename the library package, append "v5" to the name of the > > package (e.g. libfoo2 -> libfoo2v5)". >

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On 08/21/2015 10:12 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: The broken situation would be that you have programs (or libraries) foo and bar installed, both linked to libginac.so.5, with foo expecting the g++-4.x ABI and bar expecting the g++-5 ABI. Depending which version of libginac.so.5 you had installed,

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On 21/08/15 23:42, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: But wouldn't that mean that a program that's not in the archives (a commercial program, for instance) which depends on a C++ library libjoedoe.so.23 in Jessie will not work any more because there's going to be libjoedoe.so.23 compiled with the g++-5

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On 21/08/15 08:46, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: This patch replaces libginac5. This is in line with what the bug report says: Rename the library package, append v5 to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 - libfoo2v5). I can do that and will do so ASAP if it's the right thing to do. The short

Bug#791048: ginac: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

On 08/19/2015 10:56 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 at 10:01:51 +0200, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: But there is going to be libginac5 in Debian 9 anyway and this will be compiled with the new ABI. So, there is no need for a libginac2v5 package. libginac2v5 is unecessary, but