binNMUs for some recent maintainer uploads that were built against
netcdf preating the source package split:
(adding i386 for ma:same packages)
nmu ferret-vis_6.9.3-3 . amd64 . "Rebuild against the split netcdf sources."
nmu magics++_2.24.7-7 . amd64 i386 . "Rebuild against the split netcdf
On 28-08-15 10:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 15:33:10 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
dx(1:4.4.4-7)
grace (1:5.1.25-1)
gri (2.12.23-9)
kst (2.0.3-4)[also needed for netcdf-cxx-legacy]
octave-octcdf
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30:43 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
gri (2.12.23-9) doesn't need any binNMU for netcdf anymore as mentioned
in my previous message, the new upload by the maintainer already built
with the new netcdf packages on the buildds, only the maintainer build
on i386
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 15:33:10 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
dx(1:4.4.4-7)
grace (1:5.1.25-1)
gri (2.12.23-9)
kst (2.0.3-4)[also needed for netcdf-cxx-legacy]
octave-octcdf (1.1.8-1)
python-scientific (2.9.4-3)
On 19-08-15 22:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 18:34:03 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
The automatically created auto-netcdf tracker is not sufficient to track
the new C++ Fortran packages. I've attached the ben configuration I
used for my pkg-grass-transitions tracker
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 18:34:03 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
The automatically created auto-netcdf tracker is not sufficient to track
the new C++ Fortran packages. I've attached the ben configuration I
used for my pkg-grass-transitions tracker in the preparation of this
transition.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 00:11:07 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
We mostly need BinNMUs for the other packages in dependency level 1 now.
This includes gdal which has it's own upcoming transition #756867, I'd
like to start that transition soon.
Alright, go ahead.
Cheers,
Julien
7 matches
Mail list logo