2015-07-08 12:36 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Ideally we should have started a proper transition, but since the
reverse dependencies (x264) already gets broken when it is upgraded I
suggest uploading
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same.
The library has been moved to the multiarch location.
Mmmno, wait, don't
Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2015, 06:45 -0500 schrieb Bálint Réczey:
In my interpretation of [2] this is enough if both packages contain
the same file while it is not our case.
IMO 7.6.2 applies here where the Conflicts: is needed, too.
I have pushed what would work IMO.
I'd suggest to merge what
2015-07-08 13:00 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same.
The library has been moved to the multiarch location.
Which package do you want to
I started a build here [1], please have a look at the result.
[1]
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/gpac/0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-1/
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer|
2015-07-08 13:12 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same.
The
Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2015, 06:45 -0500 schrieb Bálint Réczey:
In my interpretation of [2] this is enough if both packages contain
the same file while it is not our case.
IMO 7.6.2 applies here where the Conflicts: is needed, too.
I have pushed what would work IMO.
Conflicts only apply if
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
You mean you agree with asking for binNMU for x264 or you want to tell
them something different?
In my testing x264 got fixed by a simple rebuild.
I double-checked with dak on coccia.d.o, and yes, that should be
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same.
The library has been moved to the multiarch location.
Which package do you want to force-remove?
--
Alessio Treglia |
2015-07-08 12:45 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
2015-07-08 12:36 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Ideally we should have started a proper transition, but since the
reverse dependencies
2015-07-08 10:43 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi Alessio,
2015-07-07 17:31 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi Alessio,
2015-07-06 19:35 GMT-05:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
Hello Balint,
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj d...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Ideally we should have started a proper transition, but since the
reverse dependencies (x264) already gets broken when it is upgraded I
suggest uploading the fixed package to unstable. I hope the package
passes NEW
Hi Alessio,
2015-07-07 17:31 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi Alessio,
2015-07-06 19:35 GMT-05:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
Hello Balint,
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj d...@gmx.de wrote:
Package: gpac
Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1
The package
Hi Alessio,
2015-07-06 19:35 GMT-05:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
Hello Balint,
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj d...@gmx.de wrote:
Package: gpac
Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1
The package libgpac3 should be renamed to libgpac4.
I need a few days because I'm traveling
Hello Balint,
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj d...@gmx.de wrote:
Package: gpac
Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1
The package libgpac3 should be renamed to libgpac4.
Would you please fix this?
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer |
Package: gpac
Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1
The package libgpac3 should be renamed to libgpac4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
