Hi,
On 01-08-15 14:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 10:51 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/07949bf9c63c9a80027fe8452d5fe8b9ba9b3c23
I'll see about backporting that to the 4.1 kernel in Debian until we
move to 4.2.
It turns out that this patch while
On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 10:51 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/07949bf9c63c9a80027fe8452d5fe8b9ba9b3c23
I'll see about backporting that to the 4.1 kernel in Debian until we
move to 4.2.
It turns out that this patch while necessary is not sufficient and I
also needed the
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 15:47 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Ian Campbell i...@debian.org
wrote:
On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 22:54 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Leonardo Canducci
leonardo.candu...@gmail.com wrote:
I got lost
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:23:33PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 24-07-15 15:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
There is slightly more to it then those 5 lines, but yes we should enable
voltage scaling on more boards. This mostly
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Ian Campbell i...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 22:54 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Leonardo Canducci
leonardo.candu...@gmail.com wrote:
I got lost somewhere in that long thread but I saw cpufreq on
cubie* works
for
On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 22:54 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Leonardo Canducci
leonardo.candu...@gmail.com wrote:
I got lost somewhere in that long thread but I saw cpufreq on
cubie* works
for someone [0]. It's just a matter of loading two modules. I tried
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Leonardo Canducci
leonardo.candu...@gmail.com wrote:
I got lost somewhere in that long thread but I saw cpufreq on cubie* works
for someone [0]. It's just a matter of loading two modules. I tried myself
on my jessie install (kernel from experimental) and can
I got lost somewhere in that long thread but I saw cpufreq on cubie* works
for someone [0]. It's just a matter of loading two modules. I tried myself
on my jessie install (kernel from experimental) and can confirm that:
leo@cubetto:~$ sudo modprobe axp20x-regulator
leo@cubetto:~$ sudo modprobe
Hi,
Timo wrote:
I think what Maxime was trying to say is, that while all of your boards
support Cpufreq, only the Cubietruck supports voltage scaling because only
Cubietruck has the power regulator nodes defined in it's dts file (just
have a look at the last lines of the Cubitruck dts
Hi,
On 24-07-15 12:08, Thomas Kaiser wrote:
Leonardo Canducci wrote:
I've submitted a bug [0] in the Debian BTS and tried kernel 4.0 and 4.1
from unstable and experimental branches with no success
I can confirm that it's neither working with 4.0.4 and 4.1 on cubietruck
(always tried
Am Freitag, 24. Juli 2015 14:49:42 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Kaiser:
Ah, now I think I understand. You're talking about these lines here?
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/u-boot/blob/master/arch/arm/dts/sun7i-a20-cubietruck.dts#L244-L269
Yes.
So while using CONFIG_REGULATOR_AXP20X=y
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
There is slightly more to it then those 5 lines, but yes we should enable
voltage scaling on more boards. This mostly requires someone to simply
just do the work.
I've a workshop on dts this weekend at our localhacker space and
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:58:34AM -0700, m.silentcr...@gmail.com wrote:
So while using CONFIG_REGULATOR_AXP20X=y will bring working
cpufreq support to the cubietruck, shouldn't adding these lines to
the device trees of the other 5 A20 devices enable CPU voltage
scaling there?
Basically
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:49:42AM -0700, Thomas Kaiser wrote:
Hi,
Timo wrote:
I think what Maxime was trying to say is, that while all of your boards
support Cpufreq, only the Cubietruck supports voltage scaling because only
Cubietruck has the power regulator nodes defined in it's
Hi,
On 24-07-15 15:16, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
There is slightly more to it then those 5 lines, but yes we should enable
voltage scaling on more boards. This mostly requires someone to simply
just do the work.
I've a workshop on dts
Hi,
On 24-07-15 14:49, Thomas Kaiser wrote:
Hi,
Timo wrote:
I think what Maxime was trying to say is, that while all of your boards
support Cpufreq, only the Cubietruck supports voltage scaling because only
Cubietruck has the power regulator nodes defined in it's dts file (just
have a look
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:36:57AM -0700, Thomas Kaiser wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede wrote:
Is the debian kernel building the axp209 mfd driver, and also
the axp20x regulator drive, and do these get loaded properly on the
cubietruck ?
Unfortunately I've no idea since i fetch the
Hi,
Hans de Goede wrote:
Is the debian kernel building the axp209 mfd driver, and also
the axp20x regulator drive, and do these get loaded properly on the
cubietruck ?
Unfortunately I've no idea since i fetch the kernel sources directly from
Hi,
Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:36:57AM -0700, Thomas Kaiser wrote:
And this was the kernel config I used:
https://github.com/igorpecovnik/lib/blob/429867a80c85011b6d31048481c0beb1c7bc76fa/config/linux-sunxi-next.config
# CONFIG_REGULATOR_AXP20X is not set
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:12:57AM -0700, Thomas Kaiser wrote:
What puzzles me is that exactly the same kernel (I used Igor Pečovnik's
build system) provides working cpufreq support on 5 A20 devices and one
it
fails.
And none of those 5 use CPU voltage scaling.
Maybe I
Am Freitag, 24. Juli 2015 14:12:57 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Kaiser:
Maxime Ripard wrote:
What puzzles me is that exactly the same kernel (I used Igor Pečovnik's
build system) provides working cpufreq support on 5 A20 devices and one
it
fails.
And none of those 5 use CPU
21 matches
Mail list logo
