What's the status of this bug? In #682622 it's being suggested that paths should be made relative to the location of the .mrconfig file. While this works, it does break the use of $XDG_CONFIG_PATH, should that point to an absolute path involving a symlink.
What's to speak against properly resolving the symlink chain? Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
