Hideki Yamane:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Thanks for your explanation :)
>
> On Sat, 05 Jan 2019 09:52:00 +
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> We are very far from being able to flip the default. There are some
>> 800+ packages that need to be updated to follow latest policy
>> requirements plus explicitly
Hi Niels,
Thanks for your explanation :)
On Sat, 05 Jan 2019 09:52:00 +
Niels Thykier wrote:
> We are very far from being able to flip the default. There are some
> 800+ packages that need to be updated to follow latest policy
> requirements plus explicitly declare their need for
Hideki Yamane:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 11:11:00 +
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> * Migrating to "Rules-Requires-Root: no" where possible.
>
> Is there any plan to set "Rules-Requires-Root: no" for default?
> It seems that most of the packages doesn't require root privilege
> to be
Hi,
On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 11:11:00 +
Niels Thykier wrote:
> * Migrating to "Rules-Requires-Root: no" where possible.
Is there any plan to set "Rules-Requires-Root: no" for default?
It seems that most of the packages doesn't require root privilege
to be built, so "default no" is better to
Hi,
In the past 3½ years, several things have been improved and I am
therefore taking the liberty of closing this bug against general
(remaining issues as I understand it will be in individual packages).
In particular, I think we have identified all major issues, solved most
of them and
On 2015-07-25 10:27, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
So your := variable will be evaluated 4 times, or 7+N times if you use
dh.
[...]
It should be doable to reduce the dh side of it to 1+N by caching the
result of make (in a file-based cache).
~Niels
Correction, 2+N (of the dh
On 2015-07-24 12:19, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk, 2015-07-23, 21:40:
One mistake boost makes is using := instead of plain =. Contrary
to popular belief, the former almost always causes more evaluation of
$(shell) stuff, specially when dh is involved.
Could you elaborate
* Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk, 2015-07-23, 21:40:
One mistake boost makes is using := instead of plain =. Contrary
to popular belief, the former almost always causes more evaluation of
$(shell) stuff, specially when dh is involved.
Could you elaborate on that?
dpkg-buildpackage -B will
Control: block -1 by 657390
[ Blocking on that, because there's currently no other such bug. So
not to imply this is lintian maintainers sole responsibility. ]
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 12:19:36 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
dpkg-buildpackage -B will run debian/rules 4 times: once to determine if
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:08:15PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Eduard Bloch e...@gmx.de, 2015-07-23, 19:43:
The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are about
12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or dpkg-parsechangelogs or
similar commands. When this was done a
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2015-07-23 21:08:15)
* Eduard Bloch e...@gmx.de, 2015-07-23, 19:43:
The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are
about 12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or
dpkg-parsechangelogs or similar commands. When this was done a just
couple of times
Control: block -1 by 793330
Hi!
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 19:43:46 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Package: general
Severity: minor
The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are about
12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or dpkg-parsechangelogs or
similar commands.
Quoting Eduard Bloch (2015-07-23 19:43:46)
The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff [in debian/rules files].
In boost, there are about 12 such calls. And they run
dpkg-architecture or dpkg-parsechangelogs or similar commands.
debian/rules is a make file. In the make language, variables
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:43:46 +0200 Eduard Bloch e...@gmx.de wrote:
please tell me that I am wrong or that I start fighting the windmills if
that's the case, but I have a general impression that something smells
in lots of debian/rules files nowadays and we need a concept to improve
that.
* Eduard Bloch e...@gmx.de, 2015-07-23, 19:43:
The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are
about 12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or
dpkg-parsechangelogs or similar commands. When this was done a just
couple of times (i.e. before dh(7)), that's acceptable.
Package: general
Severity: minor
Hello Fellow Maintainers,
please tell me that I am wrong or that I start fighting the windmills if
that's the case, but I have a general impression that something smells
in lots of debian/rules files nowadays and we need a concept to improve
that.
The problem: I
16 matches
Mail list logo
