On 30 Jul 2015, at 5:08 pm, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)
timothy.pot...@hp.com wrote:
On 28 Jul 2015, at 5:14 pm, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote:
So, yes, if you could work with upstream on a
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)
timothy.pot...@hp.com wrote:
On 28 Jul 2015, at 5:14 pm, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org
wrote:
So, yes, if you could work with upstream on a proper solution and then
we could just package a new upstream snapshot,
On 28 Jul 2015, at 5:14 pm, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote:
So, yes, if you could work with upstream on a proper solution and then we
could just package a new upstream snapshot, that’d be great.
I’ve just posted two pull requests on the upstream project. One to fix the
Chris, thanks for the explanation, that makes sense! I totally missed the
fact that there were not-yet-uploaded changes in git.
Tim, I just tried packaging the new upstream snapshot, and the fix you got
upstream to merge was indeed not enough. My first guess is that exampleStr
requires section1
On 28 Jul 2015, at 5:14 pm, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote:
Chris, thanks for the explanation, that makes sense! I totally missed the
fact that there were not-yet-uploaded changes in git.
Tim, I just tried packaging the new upstream snapshot, and the fix you got
upstream
On 28 Jul 2015, at 6:35 am, solo-debianb...@goeswhere.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:26:10PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
control: tags -1 + unreproducible
Chris, was this an issue on your end? Or am I misinterpreting something?
The problem seems to have gone away. I was
6 matches
Mail list logo
