Hi Bas,
Are we proceeding with the netcdf transition?
As of now, this would need to be built in experimental (I have done so
and it works).
Should we upload netcdf 4.4.0 to unstable? I would be in favour of this,
but we should probably checking with the release managers.
regards
Alastair
On
Package: magics++
Version: 2.24.7-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: netcdf-split-c-f-cxx
Dear Maintainer,
For the upcoming netcdf transition your package needs a build dependency
on libnetcdf-cxx-legacy-dev to build successfully with the netcdf
packages
On 28-07-15 16:15, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Are we proceeding with the netcdf transition?
Not yet, but we're getting close. I'm in the process of testing the
reverse dependencies with the new netcdf packages, and filing bugs for
any issues encountered. This is one of those bugs to keep track of
3 matches
Mail list logo