Hi Gianfranco,
An old message is inlined below.
2015-08-21 20:46 GMT+08:00, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it:
d/rules: I personally do not like calling bootstrap, specially when
the only thing needed there seems to be applying one patch and calling and
generating
Hi Alex,
What do you mean by not preferring the bootstrap script? I have
included the script in upstream's tarball, so that devs can
re-generate build scripts, man page and friends. Besides, according to
Hi Alex,
I contacted Ernst (upstream dev) and he agreed to integrate the build
system into his dev branch.
Wonderful! Good news are good :)
I think the above should solve the version string problem as well. Or
if it doesn't we can use the old method based on date string. I think
it should
: mlucas/14.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- program to
perform Lucas-Lehmer test on a Mersenne number
To: Alex Vong alexvong1...@gmail.com
Hi, Alex:
I am fine with option [1], integrating the build system into my
main-dev. Just need a bit of clarification - what files does the 'build
system' encompass, and where
Hi Alex,
let's review :)
d/changelog please set to unstable, and update the timestamp
d/rules: wl-asneeded is good if enable, does it introduce some problems?
are both autotools-dev and autoreconf needed?
usually the latter should superceed the former
d/rules: I personally do not like calling
Hi Gianfranco,
Thanks for the quick reply, I have just finished dinner.
2015-08-21 20:46 GMT+08:00, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it:
Hi Alex,
let's review :)
d/changelog please set to unstable, and update the timestamp
Okay.
d/rules: wl-asneeded is good if enable, does
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hi mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mlucas,
I have uploaded a new version of the package to fix issues pointed out
by Jakub Wilk,
please see previous message in the bug report to see what issues are fixed
I will now elaborate
Hi
Okay. I think this needs further explaination. Upstream does not
include a build system, not even a Makefile. Building is done by
invoking gcc directly using different flags for different platform.
This is however cumbersome, so I add autotools to ease building. I use
git for development
Hi,
Actually no. I think this needs clarification. The upstream tarball
contains .c .h files and some (non-dfsg-compliant) temporary files.
The repack script removes the (non-dfsg-compliant) temporary files and
move all the .c .h files into a directory called src/. The build
system and friends
Hi Gianfranco,
2015-08-21 22:15 GMT+08:00, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it:
so basically the tarball found with uscan has nothing in common with the
actual
Debian packaging?
you grab the tarball, you add a build system and you pack again, right?
Actually no. I think
10 matches
Mail list logo
