Bug#803629: mke2fs: Bad automatic determination of fs size with -E offset

2016-05-01 Thread Celelibi
2016-05-02 2:44 UTC+02:00, Celelibi : > 2016-05-01 5:50 UTC+02:00, Theodore Ts'o : >> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 08:41:05AM +0100, Celelibi wrote: >>> >>> When the file system size is not given, mke2fs determine the appropriate >>> size by using the size of the

Bug#803629: mke2fs: Bad automatic determination of fs size with -E offset

2016-05-01 Thread Celelibi
2016-05-01 5:50 UTC+02:00, Theodore Ts'o : > On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 08:41:05AM +0100, Celelibi wrote: >> >> When the file system size is not given, mke2fs determine the appropriate >> size by using the size of the support device. However, when the extended >> option "offset" is

Bug#803629: mke2fs: Bad automatic determination of fs size with -E offset

2016-04-30 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 08:41:05AM +0100, Celelibi wrote: > > When the file system size is not given, mke2fs determine the appropriate > size by using the size of the support device. However, when the extended > option "offset" is given, it doesn't seem to reduce the fs size to take > the offset

Bug#803629: mke2fs: Bad automatic determination of fs size with -E offset

2015-11-01 Thread Celelibi
Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.42.13-1 Severity: normal Dear maintainer, When the file system size is not given, mke2fs determine the appropriate size by using the size of the support device. However, when the extended option "offset" is given, it doesn't seem to reduce the fs size to take the