Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2016-01-10 Thread Willi Mann
Hi Chris, I did some testing on the reverse dependencies of libssh-4 (not libssh-gcrypt-4) for basic functionality with libssh where this appeared to be feasible (see attachment). From what I've seen so far, I'm confident that we won't cause big breakage. Of course, ibssh-gcrypt-4 should also be

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2016-01-09 Thread Willi Mann
Hi, Am 2016-01-09 um 02:46 schrieb Chris Knadle: > At DebConf15 there was discussion of movement away from Alioth for a number > of reasons, including Alioth being considered "too full". I don't have an > objection to hosting Debian-related work in a Debian git repository -- but > Alioth isn't

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2016-01-08 Thread Willi Mann
Hi Chris, Am 2016-01-08 um 07:57 schrieb Chris Knadle: > Willi Mann: >> >> Could you make the git repo somewhere available? > >git clone git://git.coredump.us/debian/libssh.git > > I use git-buildpackage and pristine-tar, and the clone will contain all that > plus default to the '0.7.2'

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2016-01-08 Thread Chris Knadle
Willi Mann: > Hi Chris, > > Am 2016-01-08 um 07:57 schrieb Chris Knadle: >> Willi Mann: >>> >>> Could you make the git repo somewhere available? >> >>git clone git://git.coredump.us/debian/libssh.git >> >> I use git-buildpackage and pristine-tar, and the clone will contain all that >> plus

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2016-01-07 Thread Chris Knadle
Willi Mann: > Hi, > > Am 2016-01-07 um 00:46 schrieb Chris Knadle: >> Willi Mann: >>> I can certainly do some testing, but I also don't think it is realistic >>> to runtime test all reverse dependencies ourselves. >> >> Yeah for instance remmina (remote desktop client for Gnome) -- I don't run >>

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2016-01-06 Thread Willi Mann
Hi, sorry I did not find time to answer earlier. Am 2015-12-02 um 01:22 schrieb Chris Knadle: > Mike Gabriel: >> Hi Willi, hi Laurent, >> >> On Sa 28 Nov 2015 19:29:01 CET, Willi Mann wrote: >> >>> Hi Laurent, Hi Mike, >>> >>> is there a particular reason why libssh wasn't updated to newer

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2016-01-06 Thread Chris Knadle
Willi Mann: > Hi, > > sorry I did not find time to answer earlier. Thanks for replying now. > Am 2015-12-02 um 01:22 schrieb Chris Knadle: >> Mike Gabriel: [...] >>> from my side, this has not happened, because Laurent ist the primary >>> maintainer of libssh. Also, I currently have repetetive

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2015-12-01 Thread Chris Knadle
Mike Gabriel: > Hi Willi, hi Laurent, > > On Sa 28 Nov 2015 19:29:01 CET, Willi Mann wrote: > >> Hi Laurent, Hi Mike, >> >> is there a particular reason why libssh wasn't updated to newer upstream >> versions? >> >> Bye >> Willi > > from my side, this has not happened, because Laurent ist the

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2015-12-01 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Willi, hi Laurent, On Sa 28 Nov 2015 19:29:01 CET, Willi Mann wrote: Hi Laurent, Hi Mike, is there a particular reason why libssh wasn't updated to newer upstream versions? Bye Willi from my side, this has not happened, because Laurent ist the primary maintainer of libssh. Also, I

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2015-12-01 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le 01/12/15 10:26, Mike Gabriel a écrit : Hi Willi, hi Laurent, Hi *, On Sa 28 Nov 2015 19:29:01 CET, Willi Mann wrote: Hi Laurent, Hi Mike, is there a particular reason why libssh wasn't updated to newer upstream versions? Bye Willi from my side, this has not happened, because

Bug#805030: libssh: newer upstream versions?

2015-11-28 Thread Willi Mann
Hi Laurent, Hi Mike, is there a particular reason why libssh wasn't updated to newer upstream versions? Bye Willi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature