Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

Hi Adrian, Am Freitag, den 18.12.2015, 21:40 +0100 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > On 12/18/2015 10:02 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Not yet. I have postponed it to the weekend. I was busy with fixing > > up ghc on sparc64 and was also a bit overwhelmed by the Perl > > transition.

Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/17/2015 08:55 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: >> Neverthess, please actually hold this bug for a moment, Adrian >> Glaubitz wants to give fixing ghc on armel a shot. Marking the >> bug as moreinfo. > > any progress so far? Not yet. I have

Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/18/2015 10:02 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Not yet. I have postponed it to the weekend. I was busy with fixing > up ghc on sparc64 and was also a bit overwhelmed by the Perl > transition. So, I am now doing testbuilds and I just

Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

Hi Adrian, Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 11:17 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Neverthess, please actually hold this bug for a moment, Adrian Glaubitz > wants to give fixing ghc on armel a shot. Marking the bug as moreinfo. any progress so far? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner

Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

Joachim Breitner writes: > with GHC-7.10.3, upstream dropped suppot for old ARM chipsets, such as > our armel architecture (armhf is fine). It is not the case that anyone > steps up to un-break this, so we’ll just have to remove Haskell > from armel. See also >

Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi, Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 11:14 +0100 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: > We don't have particular well tools for this, but I did the same > dance > as the last time[1] to get the list of packages that build-depend on > ghc: > >   zcat

Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

Ansgar Burchardt writes: > We don't have particular well tools for this, but I did the same dance > as the last time[1] to get the list of packages that build-depend on > ghc: > > zcat ftp/dists/unstable/main/source/Sources.gz | \ > grep-dctrl -e -ns Package -F

Bug#807343: RM: ghc [armel] -- ROM; Not supported on armel any more

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, with GHC-7.10.3, upstream dropped suppot for old ARM chipsets, such as our armel architecture (armhf is fine). It is not the case that anyone steps up to un-break this, so we’ll just have to remove