Bug#807810: got it

But this syntax does not actually forward the bug report. It documents where the bug report has been forwarded to. Why would we need more than one of those? On 15/12/15 23:19, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: Well, think email CCs. Who would have thought only one allowed! "NB" == Nicholas Bamber

Bug#807810: got it

Actually the bts man page states the syntax: forwarded bug address It makes it faitly clear that only one upstream address is supported. On 15/12/15 03:17, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: "NB" == Nicholas Bamber writes: NB> Forgot to copy the submitter. Fixed! NB> On

Bug#807810: got it

Okay. On 15/12/15 03:17, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: "NB" == Nicholas Bamber writes: NB> Forgot to copy the submitter. Fixed! NB> On 13/12/15 12:32, Nicholas Bamber wrote: You want to be able to support forwarding to two places. I doubt that this is a worthwhile idea,

Bug#807810: got it

Well, think email CCs. Who would have thought only one allowed! > "NB" == Nicholas Bamber writes: NB> Actually the bts man page states the syntax: NB> forwarded bug address NB> It makes it faitly clear that only one upstream address is supported.

Bug#807810: got it

> "NB" == Nicholas Bamber writes: NB> Forgot to copy the submitter. Fixed! NB> On 13/12/15 12:32, Nicholas Bamber wrote: >> You want to be able to support forwarding to two places. I doubt that >> this is a worthwhile idea, but in any case it would firts need to be

Bug#807810: got it

You want to be able to support forwarding to two places. I doubt that this is a worthwhile idea, but in any case it would firts need to be fixed in the Debian bugs system.

Bug#807810: got it

Forgot to copy the submitter. Fixed! On 13/12/15 12:32, Nicholas Bamber wrote: You want to be able to support forwarding to two places. I doubt that this is a worthwhile idea, but in any case it would firts need to be fixed in the Debian bugs system.