Bug#807924: ghc: empty haddock interface version on hurd-i386

2019-08-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Control: reassign -1 hurd Control: close -1 1:0.9.git20180108-1 Samuel Thibault, le mar. 15 déc. 2015 01:13:24 +0100, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault, on Tue 15 Dec 2015 00:53:48 +0100, wrote: > > Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote: > > > I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism

Bug#807924: ghc: empty haddock interface version on hurd-i386

2015-12-15 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2015, 01:13 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault: > Samuel Thibault, on Tue 15 Dec 2015 00:53:48 +0100, wrote: > > Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote: > > > I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism the build system ensures > > > that these are found, but

Bug#807924: ghc: empty haddock interface version on hurd-i386

2015-12-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote: > I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism the build system ensures > that these are found, but I’d bet on rpath. Does hurd handle rpaths > differently? It does support rpath. ghc apparently uses $ORIGIN in rpath. IIRC we added some

Bug#807924: ghc: empty haddock interface version on hurd-i386

2015-12-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Tue 15 Dec 2015 00:53:48 +0100, wrote: > Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote: > > I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism the build system ensures > > that these are found, but I’d bet on rpath. Does hurd handle rpaths > > differently? > > It does

Bug#807924: ghc: empty haddock interface version on hurd-i386

2015-12-14 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 16:26 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault: > Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 15:50:27 +0100, wrote: > > Maybe the haddock executable is broken on hurd? What happens if you > > install ghc and run haddock --interface-version? > > I get 27 ah, looking at the build

Bug#807924: ghc: empty haddock interface version on hurd-i386

2015-12-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 15:50:27 +0100, wrote: > Maybe the haddock executable is broken on hurd? What happens if you install > ghc and run haddock --interface-version? I get 27 Samuel

Bug#807924: ghc: empty haddock interface version on hurd-i386

2015-12-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Source: ghc Version: 7.10.3-4 Severity: important On the hurd-i386 port, the ghc package has Provides: ghc-dynamic, ghc-ghci, ghc-haddock, haddock, haddock-interface-, etc. while on other ports, it provides haddock-interface-27. I don't know how this is supposed to be computed, but it seems

Bug#807924: ghc: empty haddock interface version on hurd-i386

2015-12-14 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 15:24 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault: > Source: ghc > Version: 7.10.3-4 > Severity: important > > On the hurd-i386 port, the ghc package has > > Provides: ghc-dynamic, ghc-ghci, ghc-haddock, haddock, > haddock-interface-, etc. > > while on other ports, it provides