Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

Am 01.02.2016 um 16:41 schrieb Josh Triplett: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:24:21PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> I never bothered to implement more than 'd', but I am happy to >> contribute my sysvrc shell snippet I use as replacement for systems >> without systemd-tmpfiles

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:47:34PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016, at 16:41, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Implementing the various operation letters makes up half the problem. > > The other half involves handling the various tmpfiles.d directories and > > the precedence between them.

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:24:21PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I never bothered to implement more than 'd', but I am happy to > contribute my sysvrc shell snippet I use as replacement for systems > without systemd-tmpfiles installed. > > ``` > do_tmpfiles() { > local type

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

Hi Michael, I never bothered to implement more than 'd', but I am happy to contribute my sysvrc shell snippet I use as replacement for systems without systemd-tmpfiles installed. ``` do_tmpfiles() { local type path mode user group age argument if [ -r "$1" ]; then if [ -x

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016, at 16:41, Josh Triplett wrote: > Implementing the various operation letters makes up half the problem. > The other half involves handling the various tmpfiles.d directories and > the precedence between them. That includes the usual "override files > with the same filename"

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:41:59AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:24:21PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > I never bothered to implement more than 'd', but I am happy to > > contribute my sysvrc shell snippet I use as replacement for systems > > without

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

Am 23.01.2016 um 06:19 schrieb Josh Triplett: > If having tmpfiles.d support across all architectures and init systems > sounds appealing, I'd be willing to construct such a package, though I'd > want to have co-maintainers who actually run sysvinit and/or non-Linux > architectures. The subset of

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:54:21 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Ondřej > > Am 21.01.2016 um 17:28 schrieb Ondřej Surý: > > > please consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package, > > perhaps with sysvrc script provided. > > > > The tmpfiles mechanism is quite great

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

Package: systemd Version: 228-4 Severity: wishlist Dear maintainers, please consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package, perhaps with sysvrc script provided. The tmpfiles mechanism is quite great and if we can use tmpfiles mechanism in the sysvrc scripts, we could remove a lot of

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

Hi Ondřej Am 21.01.2016 um 17:28 schrieb Ondřej Surý: > please consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package, > perhaps with sysvrc script provided. > > The tmpfiles mechanism is quite great and if we can use tmpfiles > mechanism in the sysvrc scripts, we could remove a lot of custom