Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:22:53PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 12:30:06PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > I got in touch with ftp-master and they said that even uploads to
> > experimental must close RFP/ITP bugs for NEW packages. I was
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 12:30:06PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> I got in touch with ftp-master and they said that even uploads to
> experimental must close RFP/ITP bugs for NEW packages. I was wrong.
> Sorry for wasting your time! If possible, would you please build and
> sign either the
Hi Marc,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:52:09AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:10:59AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > Thank you for taking the time to review this package. For the
> > purposes of the RFS I'm requesting commit: 38ced3f on the experimental
> > branch.
P.S. the only changes are adding (Closes: this-bug), updating the time
stamp, and updating the standards-version (no changes needed)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:52:09AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:10:59AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > Thank you for taking the time to review this package. For the
> > purposes of the RFS I'm requesting commit: 38ced3f on the experimental
> > branch. I've deleted
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:10:59AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to review this package. For the
> purposes of the RFS I'm requesting commit: 38ced3f on the experimental
> branch. I've deleted all old uploads on mentors to remove any
> ambiguity.
I have built
Hi Marc,
Thank you for taking the time to review this package. For the
purposes of the RFS I'm requesting commit: 38ced3f on the experimental
branch. I've deleted all old uploads on mentors to remove any
ambiguity.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:54:13PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23,
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 06:45:24PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Sorry for the non-functional upstream sources when building with gbp.
> I just noticed that today and have fixed it. I've pushed to the
> experimental branch of the git repo. I've also enabled the systemd
> timer by default in
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:45:58AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 07:47:56PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > I'm planning to push to a git repo in the collab-maint after just a
> > bit more work. Are you interested in sponsoring this upload?
>
> Interested,
Dear Marc,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:45:58AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 07:47:56PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > I'm planning to push to a git repo in the collab-maint after just a
> > bit more work. Are you interested in sponsoring this upload?
>
> Interested,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 07:47:56PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> I'm planning to push to a git repo in the collab-maint after just a
> bit more work. Are you interested in sponsoring this upload?
Interested, yes. But no promises. My time is rather chaotic at the
moment, and I need to take a
Control: owner -1 !
As it has been almost two months without any objections or any
followup from Ioan, I am claiming this bug. Expect to see
btrfsmaintenance in Debian very soon :-)
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 07:29:40AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 05:41:06PM +0200, Ioan
P.S. And the issues this package can exacerbate still exist:
"Subject: balancing every night broke balancing so now I can't balance anymore?"
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg65387.html
This sort of thing is why I don't want to support btrfsmaintenance for
Stretch, but Stretch+1 is
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 07:29:40AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 05:41:06PM +0200, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
> > I've uploaded the package and took the reccomendations into consideration.
> >
> > http://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfsmaintenance
>
> what is the state
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 05:41:06PM +0200, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
> I've uploaded the package and took the reccomendations into consideration.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfsmaintenance
what is the state of this package? I don't see it any more on
mentors.debian.net, and it is
> Is trim different from fstrim (util-linux)? It also ships systemd timer
> configuration as an example, maybe we could enable those by default?
The trim in this case uses the 'fstrim' binary but is performend only on
the configured mountpoints (BTRFS_TRIM_MOUNTPOINTS). The fstrim.timer
service
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
> This is a set of scripts supplementing the btrfs filesystem and aims to
> automate a few maintenance tasks. This means the scrub, balance, trim or
> defragmentation.
Is trim different from fstrim (util-linux)? It also ships
Hello,
I've uploaded the package and took the reccomendations into consideration.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfsmaintenance
Regards,
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 6 February 2016 at 14:06, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Ioan Eugen Stan
>
> * Package name: btrfsmaintenance
> Version : 0.1.2
> Upstream Author : Dave
> * URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ioan Eugen Stan
* Package name: btrfsmaintenance
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Dave
* URL : https://github.com/kdave/btrfsmaintenance
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: shell
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 16:06:15 +0200, Ioan Eugen Stan
wrote:
> Each of the tasks can be turned on/off and configured independently. The
> default config values were selected to fit the default installation profile of
> openSUSE 13.2 where the root filesystem is formatted to
21 matches
Mail list logo