Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Ana, Quoting Ana Custura (2016-03-05 20:23:36) > Hi all, > > On 05/03/16 14:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>> Of course, the information can be rephrased and moved if one wants >>> to put less emphasis on it (for more emphasis elsewhere). For >>> instance, we could add something like

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-05 Thread Ana Custura
Hi all, On 05/03/16 14:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Of course, the information can be rephrased and moved if one wants to put >> less >> emphasis on it (for more emphasis elsewhere). For instance, we could add >> something like "Debian Pure Blends are developed, distributed and supported >>

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Charles Plessy (2016-03-05 14:28:54) > Le Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 03:12:36PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : >> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: >>> On 01/03/16 13:18, Charles Plessy wrote: By the way, I do not see the paragraph starting by "Debian Pure Blends

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-05 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 03:12:36PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > > On 01/03/16 13:18, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> By the way, I do not see the paragraph starting by "Debian Pure Blends are > >> not > >> forks from" in your proposal. Are

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-05 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
Hi Paul, On 05/03/16 07:28, Paul Wise wrote: >> I've committed the first paragraph and the changes to the second one >> that were missed. I have removed the first paragraph that you added. I agree with Charles entirely. If you still feel that it doesn't make sense to jump into directly, then it

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > maybe I am too much of a scientist, but I prefer when the first paragraph > directly answers to the question "what is this ?". I tend to lose interest or > focus when reading narratives such as the first paragraph you propose below. The

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> maybe I am too much of a scientist, but I prefer when the first paragraph >> directly answers to the question "what is this ?". I tend to lose interest >> or >> focus when reading

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > I've committed the first paragraph and the changes to the second one > that were missed. The overall diff: https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/blends/index.wml?r1=1.25=1.22 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-04 Thread Ana Custura
Hi Paul, On 05/03/16 07:12, Paul Wise wrote: >> > I don't think it's necessary to remove the second paragraph, it's >> > important to the concept of Pure Blends and is not covered in the first >> > paragraph. Ok, I'll remove that paragraph as well. Ana

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > On 01/03/16 13:18, Charles Plessy wrote: >> By the way, I do not see the paragraph starting by "Debian Pure Blends are >> not >> forks from" in your proposal. Are you suggesting to remove it ? > > I don't think it's necessary to remove

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-04 Thread Ana Custura
Control: owner -1 ! Hi all, On 05/03/16 05:02, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > Ana (in CC) has been doing some work on the blends website. I will let > her make this change in the webwml repository so she can get some > exposure to the BTS. I'm looking at this now :) Ana

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-04 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
Hi All, On 01/03/16 13:18, Charles Plessy wrote: > This said, the paragraph below (or the alternative versions discussed in this > thread) would be a nice improvement to the current page. Thank you for > proposing this. > >> >> Debian Pure Blends are a solution for groups of people with

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-03-01 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 03:31:08PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : > > I would like to change the current introduction to Debian Pure Blends > on the website to the following text. Hi Paul and everybody, maybe I am too much of a scientist, but I prefer when the first paragraph directly answers to

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-02-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Justin B Rye wrote: > or (maybe better, maybe my critical faculties are just going numb): > >Their common goal is to simplify installation and administration of >computers for their target audience, and to connect that audience >with the people writing

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-02-29 Thread Justin B Rye
Paul Wise wrote: >> # >> # Debian Pure Blends are a solution for groups of people with specific needs. >> # Not only do they provide handy collections (meta-packages) of specific >> packages, >> # but they also ease installation and configuration for the intended purpose. >> # They cover the

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-02-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > The common goal of those is to make 12 installation and administration > of computers for their target users as easy as 13 possible, and to > serve in the role as the missing link between software 14 developers > and users well. And without the

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-02-29 Thread Paul Wise
[Someone dropped -blends, re-added] On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Justin B Rye wrote: > Iain R. Learmonth wrote: >> Could someone take a look at the wording for this to ensure it's >> understandable >> by non-technical users and to ensure that it's easily translatable. >> >> Please keep the

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-02-29 Thread Justin B Rye
Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > Could someone take a look at the wording for this to ensure it's > understandable > by non-technical users and to ensure that it's easily translatable. > > Please keep the bug in CC, I'm not subscribed to debian-l10n-english. Quoting that proposed text: # # A general

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-02-29 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
Hi, Could someone take a look at the wording for this to ensure it's understandable by non-technical users and to ensure that it's easily translatable. Please keep the bug in CC, I'm not subscribed to debian-l10n-english. Thanks, Iain.

Bug#816159: www.debian.org: new introduction for blends page

2016-02-27 Thread Paul Wise
Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ble...@lists.debian.org, debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org I would like to change the current introduction to Debian Pure Blends on the website to the following text. The new introduction is derived from the 'Learn More' section