Bug#822974: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Backport of GnuPG 2.1

block 822974 by 834281 thanks Hi Daniel, On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 18:58:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Wed 2017-02-08 15:05:09 -0500, Luca Capello wrote: > > >> Daniel, what do you think about adding the jessie-backports branches I > >> have locally to the corresponding Git repositories

Bug#822974: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Backport of GnuPG 2.1

Hi Luca-- Thank you for all this work, this is awesome! sorry for my delay in responding. On Wed 2017-02-08 15:05:09 -0500, Luca Capello wrote: >> Daniel, what do you think about adding the jessie-backports branches I >> have locally to the corresponding Git repositories on Alioth? I think

Bug#822974: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Backport of GnuPG 2.1

Hi there ! Adding Daniel Pocock and Robert Lange to Cc:, sorry if I forgot to do it with my first reply to this bug. On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 23:18:10 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > > > libassuan-dev > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > libassuan (2.4.3-2~bpo8+1)

Bug#822974: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Backport of GnuPG 2.1

On 2017-01-28 Luca Capello wrote: [...] > > > libgcrypt20-dev > "[2017-01-26] Accepted 1.7.6-1 in unstable (medium) (Andreas Metzler)" > Cc:ing the Debian GnuTLS Maintainers list and Bcc:ing Andreas Metzler > who did the upload: is that version target for stretch,

Bug#822974: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Backport of GnuPG 2.1

user product...@infomaniak.com usertag 849845 + infomaniak.com-authentication thanks Hi Daniel, On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 02:37:51 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Mon 2017-01-16 16:14:01 -0500, Luca Capello wrote: > > Any news on this? At work we have recently deployed OpenPGP (via > > YubiKey

Bug#822974: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Backport of GnuPG 2.1

Hi Luca-- On Mon 2017-01-16 16:14:01 -0500, Luca Capello wrote: > On Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:23:25 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> On Thu 2016-10-06 05:17:54 -0400, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> > It'd be nice to have a backport of GnuPG 2.1 to Jessie, so that one > [...] >>

Bug#822974: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Backport of GnuPG 2.1

Hi Daniel, On Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:23:25 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2016-10-06 05:17:54 -0400, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > It'd be nice to have a backport of GnuPG 2.1 to Jessie, so that one [...] > https://bugs.debian.org/822974 > > last week, the changes i was waiting for did

Bug#822974: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Backport of GnuPG 2.1

Hi Thomas-- On Thu 2016-10-06 05:17:54 -0400, Thomas Goirand wrote: > It'd be nice to have a backport of GnuPG 2.1 to Jessie, so that one > could use the ssh forwarding facility, which would be very useful for > package maintainers running Stable on their workstation/laptop, and > building in Sid