Ari Pollak wrote:
Ari, the best I can then offer would be a switch for
skipping the gconf2
dependency (i.e. an opt-out). Is that still
interesting?
Probably not worth it, I think I'm just
On Tue, May 31, 2016, 1:45 AM Niels Thykier wrote:.
>
> Ari, the best I can then offer would be a switch for skipping the gconf2
> dependency (i.e. an opt-out). Is that still interesting?
>
Probably not worth it, I think I'm just going to remove the gconf stuff
from pidgin.
Josselin Mouette:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Le lundi 30 mai 2016 à 19:32 +, Niels Thykier a écrit :
>> Can you confirm that this dependency on gconf2 is now unnecessary? At
>> first glance I cannot see a need for it now that the autoscripts have
>> been removed.
>
> Unless the functionality is
Hi Niels,
Le lundi 30 mai 2016 à 19:32 +, Niels Thykier a écrit :
> Can you confirm that this dependency on gconf2 is now unnecessary? At
> first glance I cannot see a need for it now that the autoscripts have
> been removed.
Unless the functionality is optional in the package (which is the
On Tue, 10 May 2016 21:58:36 -0400 Ari Pollak wrote:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: 9.20160403
> Severity: wishlist
>
> dh_gconf still adds gconf2 to ${misc:Depends}, but AFAICT that's a legacy
> holdout and is no longer needed anymore. The gconf2 package uses triggers to
>
Package: debhelper
Version: 9.20160403
Severity: wishlist
dh_gconf still adds gconf2 to ${misc:Depends}, but AFAICT that's a legacy
holdout and is no longer needed anymore. The gconf2 package uses triggers to
update its database with new schemas; if you install gconf2, it will
rebuild the
6 matches
Mail list logo