Bug#827685: RFS: elpa-undo-tree/0.6.4-1 ITP

> > > 2. Is there some reason you packaged version 0.6.4? 0.6.6 is > > > available. > >=20 > > $ git tag | grep 0.6.6 > > [empty] > Hmm, nevermind, not sure where I thought I'd found 0.6.8. There is Version: 0.6.6 header in elisp file in upstream master. But there is no corresponding tag. I

Bug#827685: RFS: elpa-undo-tree/0.6.4-1 ITP

Hello, On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:06:29PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > 1. The /source/ package name should actually be undo-tree not > >elpa-undo-tree (team convention to use upstream's name). Probably > >not worth changing now, but you should be aware of this for packaging > >

Bug#827685: RFS: elpa-undo-tree/0.6.4-1 ITP

> 1. The /source/ package name should actually be undo-tree not >elpa-undo-tree (team convention to use upstream's name). Probably >not worth changing now, but you should be aware of this for packaging >other addons (you mentioned you wanted to package evil). Ok. In self-protection

Bug#827685: RFS: elpa-undo-tree/0.6.4-1 ITP

Hello, On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 07:55:34AM +0900, Sean Whitton wrote: > As a member of the Emacs packaging team, I've had a look at this, and it > seems fine. Thanks Dmitry. In an attempt to improve the output of dh-make-elpa I'm looking at Dmitry's package again, and I came up with the

Bug#827685: RFS: elpa-undo-tree/0.6.4-1 ITP

control: tag -1 +confirmed As a member of the Emacs packaging team, I've had a look at this, and it seems fine. Thanks Dmitry. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#827685: RFS: elpa-undo-tree/0.6.4-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elpa-undo-tree" * Package name: elpa-undo-tree Version : 0.6.4-1 Upstream Author : Toby Cubitt * Url :