On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 04:22:38PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:30:38PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >(got to that point - attaching a diff which built with 2.6.0)
>
> I'm not entirely convinced that this change captures what you're trying to
> achieve with 2.6.0, as
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:30:38PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>(got to that point - attaching a diff which built with 2.6.0)
I'm not entirely convinced that this change captures what you're trying to
achieve with 2.6.0, as the second expression to sed makes LEX_SUBVERSION in
this case equal to
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 09:24:14PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:22:37PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, why does USE_LEXWRAP take an option? It doesn't appear to
> > do anything with it.
>
> Looking at the history, it turns out that my original idea
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:22:37PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why does USE_LEXWRAP take an option? It doesn't appear to
> do anything with it.
Looking at the history, it turns out that my original idea was to use
the parameter as part of the name for the actual yywrap
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:41:12AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:22:37PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
>> configure.in doesn't cope with 2.6:
>>
>> sed -e 's/^2.5.//
>>
>> resulting in this output from configure:
>>
>> checking version of flex... 2.6.0
>>
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:22:37PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 03:40:14PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >I normally don't build with "new" flex, but took a look today and had
> >no problem building with the version in testing (which appears to match
> >that in
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 03:40:14PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>I normally don't build with "new" flex, but took a look today and had
>no problem building with the version in testing (which appears to match
>that in experimental).
>
>What is the problem that you are seeing when building?
The
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:47:24PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> The problem appears to be that flex is now version 2.6.0, which
> configure doesn't appear to handle. I'll revert to the older flex for
> now.
I normally don't build with "new" flex, but took a look today and had
no problem
The problem appears to be that flex is now version 2.6.0, which
configure doesn't appear to handle. I'll revert to the older flex for
now.
On 30 July 2016 at 21:44, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> Package: vile-filters
> Version: 9.8r-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>
Package: vile-filters
Version: 9.8r-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Since the recent upgrade to 9.8r-1 in Sid, I'm unable to edit e-mails due
to vile's mail filter being broken. Vile drops me into the HighlightFilter
buffer everytime I try to edit an e-mail. If I run the
10 matches
Mail list logo