On Friday, January 13, 2017 10:04:44 AM CST you wrote:
> Sorry for the delay!
That's no problem. With Debian in freeze, I'm not in any hurry.
> If you are still interested please join the Qt/KDE team
> on alioth.
Done.
> Is qtav as repo name OK for you?
Sure.
-S
signature.asc
On lunes, 2 de enero de 2017 14:28:02 ART Steve Robbins wrote:
[snip]
> I've never heard of Qt-extras. If that's a better fit: fine with me. Where
> is the repo?
Sorry for the delay! If you are still interested please join the Qt/KDE team
on alioth. Is qtav as repo name OK for you?
Thanks,
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 07:01:49PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > I've never heard of Qt-extras. If that's a better fit: fine with me. Where
> > is the repo?
>
> We never created it, but we can easily do it.
>
> Dmitry/anyone else: any thoughts before I go ahead?
No
On lunes, 2 de enero de 2017 14:28:02 ART Steve Robbins wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2017 4:17:14 PM CST you wrote:
> > On miércoles, 28 de diciembre de 2016 14:14:51 ART Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > Having heard nothing, I will go ahead with packaging QtAV.
> > >
> > > I'd really rather do
On Monday, January 2, 2017 4:17:14 PM CST you wrote:
> On miércoles, 28 de diciembre de 2016 14:14:51 ART Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Having heard nothing, I will go ahead with packaging QtAV.
> >
> > I'd really rather do this as a team-maintained package. Is this something
> > that would be
On miércoles, 28 de diciembre de 2016 14:14:51 ART Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 1:30:39 PM CST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
> Meyer wrote:
> > Well, the FRP was not done by a team member nor, as far as I know, anyone
> > one the team is thinking in packaging it.
> >
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 1:30:39 PM CST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer wrote:
> Well, the FRP was not done by a team member nor, as far as I know, anyone
> one the team is thinking in packaging it.
>
> I'm CCing the RFP bug to see if he's still interested in packaging it. El se
> I
On domingo, 18 de diciembre de 2016 13:53:34 ART Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sunday, December 18, 2016 2:49:42 PM CST Simon Frei wrote:
> > [...] upstream has dropped QTmultimedia for video handling and uses
> > QtAV (which in turn is based of ffmpeg). Unfortunately QtAV is not yet
> > in debian
Sorry for not responding on this. I don't really use digikam for video
files and the few videos I had in my digikam collections still did not
run after.
However upstream has dropped QTmultimedia for video handling and uses
QtAV (which in turn is based of ffmpeg). Unfortunately QtAV is not yet
in
Hi Martin & Simon,
In my testing yesterday, I found that before the "fix", NONE of my video
files played on digikam. After I built with ENABLE_MEDIAPLAYER=ON, then
at least some of my videos played. But not all of them.
I wanted to ask whether this matches your experience.
On Tue, Nov 01,
Am Dienstag, 1. November 2016, 13:34:32 CET schrieb Simon Frei:
> I can confirm this problem. This is already reported and closed upstream
> as a QTmultimedia issue:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366387
> Installing the mentioned gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad does not help and I am
> not aware
I can confirm this problem. This is already reported and closed upstream
as a QTmultimedia issue:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366387
Installing the mentioned gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad does not help and I am
not aware of an issue reported to QT.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
found 834131 digikam/4:5.2.0-3
thanks
Hi Steven,
now I get:
digikam.general: scan mode: ScanDeferredFiles
digikam.general: total scan value : 47779
digikam.database: items to tag ()
digikam.database: Complete scan took: 1060 msecs.
digikam.general: Event is dispatched through a passive pop-up
13 matches
Mail list logo
