Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hello Luca. Thanks a lot for implementing this! I'm going to answer to an old message of yours, because I think that things have changed a little bit since then. El 18/10/23 a las 19:17, Luca Boccassi escribió: We can do an upload, but note that it won't have any effect on package builds,

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-10-30 21:53:59) > El 30/10/23 a las 21:16, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió: > > Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:17:40) > >> We can do an upload, but note that it won't have any effect on package > >> builds, given the buildds use stable/oldstable > > > >

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

El 30/10/23 a las 21:16, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió: Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:17:40) We can do an upload, but note that it won't have any effect on package builds, given the buildds use stable/oldstable actually we forgot something here. The upload *does* have an

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hi, Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:17:40) > We can do an upload, but note that it won't have any effect on package > builds, given the buildds use stable/oldstable actually we forgot something here. The upload *does* have an effect on buildds right now even before Trixie gets released

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hi Luca, Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:38:16) > Thanks - I'll merge and do an upload over the weekend then thank you for your upload!! :D I temporarily subscribed to debootstrap via tracker.d.o so that I hopefully catch any bug report coming in related to this change. I also

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 18:36, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:17:40) > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 18:04, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-10-12 17:56:04) > > > >

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hi Luca, Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:17:40) > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 18:04, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-10-12 17:56:04) > > > Johannes has asked the RMs in this thread: > > > > > >

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 18:04, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > Hi, > > Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-10-12 17:56:04) > > Johannes has asked the RMs in this thread: > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2023/10/msg00425.html > > > > if they are ready to consider the bugs as RC.

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hi, Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-10-12 17:56:04) > Johannes has asked the RMs in this thread: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2023/10/msg00425.html > > if they are ready to consider the bugs as RC. I believe it would be better > if we can make the bugs "factually" RC by uploading the

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

El 10/10/23 a las 13:46, Luca Boccassi escribió: Given the list of affected packages is short (and it's all about tzdata IIRC), how about we wait until that list is down to zero (and if you have time, maybe you could help with that?), and then merge this change? That way we don't add

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 00:42, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > Hi Julien, > > thank you for your quick reply! > > Quoting Julien Cristau (2023-09-28 17:49:51) > > I guess more than mixing two different things I disagree that that is > > debootstrap's responsibility, and so I disagree

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hi Julien, thank you for your quick reply! Quoting Julien Cristau (2023-09-28 17:49:51) > I guess more than mixing two different things I disagree that that is > debootstrap's responsibility, and so I disagree that that is a valid bug. In > my view it's more important for debootstrap to

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 12:42:27PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > El 28/9/23 a las 11:50, Julien Cristau escribió: > > I still think that is absolutely the wrong thing to do, and makes > > debootstrap more fragile for no good reason. > > Julien, I believe you are mixing two different things here.

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

El 28/9/23 a las 11:50, Julien Cristau escribió: I still think that is absolutely the wrong thing to do, and makes debootstrap more fragile for no good reason. Julien, I believe you are mixing two different things here. (A) What this bug is really about. (B) What the effect of the bug is.

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hi, I still think that is absolutely the wrong thing to do, and makes debootstrap more fragile for no good reason. If you think a particular package shouldn't be priority:required then file a bug against ftp.debian.org to change it. Cheers, Julien On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 20:13:45 +0200,

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

The remaining bugs are now properly user-tagged and can be found here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian...@lists.debian.org;tag=missing-build-depends-on-not-build-essential On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 20:13:45 +0200 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Santiago is in CC

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On Sat, 23 Sept 2023 at 19:13, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 06:01:13 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-24 20:23:25) > > > Julien Cristau (2016-09-12): > > > > This is a transient situation because some Essential

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hi all, On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 06:01:13 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote: > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-24 20:23:25) > > Julien Cristau (2016-09-12): > > > This is a transient situation because some Essential packages' > > > dependencies changed. I'd consider this a bug in the archive, not in >

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hi, Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-24 20:23:25) > Julien Cristau (2016-09-12): > > This is a transient situation because some Essential packages' > > dependencies changed. I'd consider this a bug in the archive, not in > > debootstrap. > Any reasons to keep this bug

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Julien Cristau (2016-09-12): > This is a transient situation because some Essential packages' > dependencies changed. I'd consider this a bug in the archive, not in > debootstrap. Any reasons to keep this bug report open then? Seen no objections, so I'm tempted to close it.

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 14:07:04 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.81 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > in Debian, every binary package implicitly depends on all binary > packages marked as Essential:yes and every source package implicitly > build-depends on the

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On 2016-09-08 22:12 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 19:40:15 +0200 Sven Joachim wrote: >> Looking at the code in scripts/sid, it is "x_core_install mawk" which >> fails here. The reason is that mawk has not been downloaded, >> debootstrap's limited

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On 2016-09-08 20:54 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:40:15PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > >> | Setting up perl-base (5.22.2-5) ... >> | dpkg: error: --install needs at least one package archive file argument >> ` >> >> Looking at the code in scripts/sid, it is

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Hi, On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 19:40:15 +0200 Sven Joachim wrote: > Looking at the code in scripts/sid, it is "x_core_install mawk" which > fails here. The reason is that mawk has not been downloaded, > debootstrap's limited dependency resolver cannot resolve base-files' >

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:40:15PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > | Setting up perl-base (5.22.2-5) ... > | dpkg: error: --install needs at least one package archive file argument > ` > > Looking at the code in scripts/sid, it is "x_core_install mawk" which > fails here. The reason is that

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

On 2016-09-08 14:07 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.81 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > in Debian, every binary package implicitly depends on all binary > packages marked as Essential:yes and every source package implicitly > build-depends on the binary package

Bug#837060: debootstrap: Do not install packages of Priority:required for buildd variant

Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.81 Severity: normal Hi, in Debian, every binary package implicitly depends on all binary packages marked as Essential:yes and every source package implicitly build-depends on the binary package build-essential. Policy §4.2 says: | it must be possible to build