On 2016-10-15 21:28 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:22:56PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2016-10-11 16:34 +0200, Ailin Nemui wrote:
>>
>> > Package: libtinfo-dev
>> > Version: 6.0+20160917-1
>> >
>> > I need libtinfo.so and stumbled upon this sentence in the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:22:56PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-10-11 16:34 +0200, Ailin Nemui wrote:
>
> > Package: libtinfo-dev
> > Version: 6.0+20160917-1
> >
> > I need libtinfo.so and stumbled upon this sentence in the description.
> > It is bad for 2 reasons - no explanation given -
On 2016-10-11 16:34 +0200, Ailin Nemui wrote:
> Package: libtinfo-dev
> Version: 6.0+20160917-1
>
> I need libtinfo.so and stumbled upon this sentence in the description.
> It is bad for 2 reasons - no explanation given - no suggested action.
>
> My guess is to depend on ncurses, but why if I
Package: libtinfo-dev
Version: 6.0+20160917-1
I need libtinfo.so and stumbled upon this sentence in the description.
It is bad for 2 reasons - no explanation given - no suggested action.
My guess is to depend on ncurses, but why if I only need tinfo?
Cheers,
4 matches
Mail list logo