On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:02:51AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
> The Server::Starter tests should probably specify a max_wait parameter
> to test_tcp(). That should fix at least these hangs, probably in
> exchange for test failures.
On second look, I was wrong here. Test::TCP already caps max_wait
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:24:06PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:03:49 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
> > Given it fails somewhat regularly on both ci.debian.net and
> > tests.reproducible-builds.org, possibly a faster machine would improve
> > the chances of reproducing it.
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:03:49 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Given it fails somewhat regularly on both ci.debian.net and
> tests.reproducible-builds.org, possibly a faster machine would improve
> the chances of reproducing it. Just getting the log of 'strace -f
> -olog prove -l t/01-starter.t' when it
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 08:15:46PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:13:53 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
> > This package occasionally fails its autopkgtest checks on ci.debian.net.
> >
> > https://ci.debian.net/packages/libs/libserver-starter-perl/unstable/amd64/
I've been
> I'm not going to engage in severity pingpong
Oh! Nor here, please don't worry… Urgh.
> but I'd like to note that intermittent build failures used to be
> 'important' for a long time
I did not realise this.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'`
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:13:53 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> This package occasionally fails its autopkgtest checks on ci.debian.net.
>
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/libs/libserver-starter-perl/unstable/amd64/
>
> It's not clear to me which test is hanging; it looks like t/04-starter-dir.t
>
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:37:31PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:44:45 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > Non-deterministic FTBFS is a FTBFS IMHO and thus warrants RC severity.
>
> Ah, that discussion again :)
Well, some day we all should agree about what to do with those
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:44:45 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Non-deterministic FTBFS is a FTBFS IMHO and thus warrants RC severity.
Ah, that discussion again :)
> If it helps, the Reproducible Builds framework is seeing this:
>
>
severity 841662 serious
thanks
Hi,
Non-deterministic FTBFS is a FTBFS IMHO and thus warrants RC severity.
If it helps, the Reproducible Builds framework is seeing this:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libserver-starter-perl.html
Regards,
--
,''`.
Package: libserver-starter-perl
Version: 0.32-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
This package occasionally fails its autopkgtest checks on ci.debian.net.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/libs/libserver-starter-perl/unstable/amd64/
It's not clear to me
10 matches
Mail list logo
