Hi,
I've send an updated version of autopkgtest-virt-unshare as a merge
request:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/merge_requests/138
Cheers Jochen
* Jochen Sprickerhof [2022-04-17 22:10]:
Hi,
* Martin Pitt [2016-11-16 13:37]:
Johannes Schauer [2016-11-16 1:12 +0100]:
in
Hi,
* Martin Pitt [2016-11-16 13:37]:
Johannes Schauer [2016-11-16 1:12 +0100]:
in the context of #833407 I told you about my plan of adding a
virtualization backend which would allow completely unprivileged chroot
operation by using linux user namespaces.
Nice!
In contrast to what I
Hi again,
Quoting Johannes Schauer (2016-12-08 18:10:18)
> Firstly, because the autopkgtest-virt-* program is in the same process group
> it will also receive the Ctrl+C sent by the user and will immediately clean
> up and exit. The problem with autopkgtest doing that from the sbuild point of
>
Hi Martin,
Quoting Martin Pitt (2016-12-08 17:59:44)
> Johannes Schauer [2016-11-16 17:32 +0100]:
> > For example, most notably, "mount -t proc proc /proc" never worked without
> > doing the systemcalls manually using the perl script I present there. This
> > problem of course might also have
Hi,
Quoting Martin Pitt (2016-12-08 17:43:39)
> Maybe I misunderstood you above, but you said that sbuild was creating the
> "session", which I assumed was the schroot session that it uses to build the
> package and run its autopkgtest in.
>
> If sbuild *does* control the schroot session, then
Hello Josch,
Johannes Schauer [2016-11-16 17:32 +0100]:
> For example, most notably, "mount -t proc proc /proc" never worked without
> doing the systemcalls manually using the perl script I present there. This
> problem of course might also have been due to remaining bugs in the tools I
> used
Johannes Schauer [2016-12-08 16:53 +0100]:
> > > Should sbuild expect that
> > > after the user presses Ctrl+C, the autopkgtest backend takes care to
> > > completely
> > > shut down the backend by itself? I don't think this is a viable option
> > > because
> > > the autopkgtest backend used by
Hi Martin,
Quoting Martin Pitt (2016-12-08 16:37:58)
> Johannes Schauer [2016-11-26 6:03 +]:
> > I don't know what the best course of action here is. Should sbuild expect
> > that
> > after the user presses Ctrl+C, the autopkgtest backend takes care to
> > completely
> > shut down the
Hello Johannes,
Johannes Schauer [2016-11-26 6:03 +]:
> I don't know what the best course of action here is. Should sbuild expect that
> after the user presses Ctrl+C, the autopkgtest backend takes care to
> completely
> shut down the backend by itself? I don't think this is a viable option
Hi,
Quoting Johannes Schauer (2016-11-26 06:03:45)
> So if I use sbuild with the autopkgtest schroot backend, and then press
> Ctrl+C during dpkg-buildpackage, the following will happen:
>
> - the hook_cleanup() of autopkgtest-virt-schroot is called
> - schroot is unable to close the session
Hi,
Quoting Johannes Schauer (2016-11-16 16:32:05)
> Quoting Martin Pitt (2016-11-16 16:17:29)
> > Johannes Schauer [2016-11-16 14:13 +0100]:
> > > I have another autopkgtest-specific question. Currently, when using this
> > > code with sbuild and I hit Ctrl+C to send a SIGINT, it appears as if
>
Hi,
Quoting Martin Pitt (2016-11-16 16:17:29)
> Johannes Schauer [2016-11-16 14:13 +0100]:
> > Unfortunately, I was unable to achieve the same I'm currently doing with
> > lxc-usernsexec and lxc-unshare with unshare and nsenter.
>
> Interesting; now you sparked my curiosity :-) Do you happen to
Hey Josch,
Johannes Schauer [2016-11-16 14:13 +0100]:
> Unfortunately, I was unable to achieve the same I'm currently doing with
> lxc-usernsexec and lxc-unshare with unshare and nsenter.
Interesting; now you sparked my curiosity :-) Do you happen to
remember the details what isn't working?
>
Hi,
Quoting Martin Pitt (2016-11-16 13:37:50)
> > - the lxc package installed for lxc-usernsexec and lxc-unshare
>
> I'd like to eliminate this even. util-linux' unshare has known about
> --user/-U for a while now, and thus replaces lxc-unshare and
> lxc-usernsexec:
>
> $ unshare -rmU sh -c
Hello Josch,
Johannes Schauer [2016-11-16 1:12 +0100]:
> in the context of #833407 I told you about my plan of adding a
> virtualization backend which would allow completely unprivileged chroot
> operation by using linux user namespaces.
Nice!
> In contrast to what I thought was required back
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 4.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi Martin,
in the context of #833407 I told you about my plan of adding a
virtualization backend which would allow completely unprivileged chroot
operation by using linux user namespaces. In contrast to what I thought
was required
16 matches
Mail list logo
